Best Of
What’s your opinion? UGA starting Wide Recievers
I think we need to use Riley Ridley, Mecole Hardman, and JJ Holloman more. Those guys are monsters. Simmons, Crumpton, and Godwin are great and all but Holloman is starting to put it together and Ridley and Hardman are physical freaks. Our passing game should sky rocket from here.
Re: On the O-Line
@HunkerDown10 said:
If it wasn't clear enough before, stacking elite talent one on top another (not simply "building quality depth") is key to maintaining a dominant line even through injuries - clearly Cade Mayes was a "need" not the "want" that we originally expected.With that being said, I expect the OT section of our current commitment list to move on from a "quality depth" player to an "elite talent" in the near future. And on that note, can somebody check with @thebamaWay to make sure we still don't have a shot with Clay Webb? Asking for a friend
Boom, speak it into fruition
On the O-Line
If it wasn't clear enough before, stacking elite talent one on top another (not simply "building quality depth") is key to maintaining a dominant line even through injuries - clearly Cade Mays was a "need" not the "want" that we originally expected.
With that being said, I expect the OT section of our current commitment list to move on from a "quality depth" player to an "elite talent" in the near future. And on that note, can somebody check with @thebamaWay to make sure we still don't have a shot with Clay Webb? Asking for a friend 
HunkerDown10
Re: Here's what I think Kirby should require after a touchdown
@MinnesotaDawg said:
@Red_N_Black said:
Let's get real honest here. We all know that Holloman dropped the ball before crossing the goal line. It was pretty obvious. We were just really lucky the refs didn't have to right view to overturn the TD call. That was a 14 point swing. We ended up winning by 14 points. Enough is enough. Kirby should respond by requiring all UGA TD makers to do one of the following after a score:
1. Carry the ball all the way thorough and out the back of the end zone, or
2. Hand the ball to a ref after a score, or
3. Touch the ball down in the end zone. (this was actually required in college football eons ago and is where the term "touchdown" came from)
This may seem ridiculous and like overkill to some but the fact is whatever the coaches told them after the USCjr episode didn't sink in. I've seen this like 4 times in my life and 2 were by our Dogs this season. Totally embarrassing.I agree with pretty much everything you said....the ball drop is absolutely idiotic and indefensible. Except, can you please explain the reasoning of how the ball-drop would have been a 14-point swing. I heard Kirby mention this, too. Makes no sense to me. It's not like we would lose the TD AND give them a TD at the same time. 14-point swing is a 99 yard interception or fumble return, not a premature ball drop.
The Missouri defensive back actually picked up the ball in our end zone a ran 100 yards for what should have been a Missouri TD
Re: The most surprising teams in CFB so far this season ?
SEC: Kentucky
ACC: FSU (for how awful they have looked)
BIG12: Texas (could be ready for a breakthrough finally)
BIG10: Nebraska (See FSU)
PAC12: ASU (everyone clowned the Edwards hire but he's exceeded expectations thus far)
Re: Does anyone agree with Drew Lock that Missouri beat itself?
It's a good thing they still keep score in these games
Kasey
Does anyone agree with Drew Lock that Missouri beat itself?
I try to stay objective, sometimes to a fault, but I never felt like Georgia was in danger of losing at Missouri -- it's good for the Tigers to be confident, but I'm not sure I would take the "beat ourselves" approach here: https://dawgs.us/2zpZyUR
Re: Does anyone agree with Drew Lock that Missouri beat itself?
@WCDawg said:
Clearly turnovers hurt them, and I'd expect any team to point them out after losing a game like that.
Our players and scheme had something to do with causing turnovers though.
100% Agree. While the INT that bounced in/out of Mizzou guy's hands and landed gently in Tae Crowder's loving arms is more of an anamoly than anything, I contend the remaining TO's were simply plays where the scheme was married perfectly with the talent. Stokes swooping in face-block the punt, or D Baker denying the first down on 4th & short are examples. Mizzou might make an argument about mistakes made during those particular plays, but without Stokes' speed or Baker's just being awesome, those plays do not get made.
