- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
Best Of
Re: Where is everybody/anybody ?
It’s been a quiet season, so no heated debates as usual. Hope you're feeling a bit better every day and taking good care of yourself.
Dawg1959
Re: Column: Georgia QB play shaky at G-Day, a question mark if Dawgs look to repeat in SEC
This is having the G Day game televised is such a big deal. It lets us take our time (many months till Game #1) and analyze each play. I really have NO IDEA how well Stockton did. Were they on target but the curse of last year got us again? Were they overthrown/underthrown? Good judgment/Bad judgment? No clue.
kirkhilles
Re: Column: Georgia QB play shaky at G-Day, a question mark if Dawgs look to repeat in SEC
Let’s hope that unlike last summer, the guys like Stockton & other upperclassmen who’ve been in Athens for several years will become leaders. They need to get the rest of the team in the weight room, on the field for 7 on 7 work, & whatever else is necessary to build this brotherhood players always talk about. That way they show up in August in condition, on the same page, & ready to dominate like the Dawgs did from 21-23!! GO DAWGS!!
Betheredge
Re: Georgia football stock report: Bulldogs makes gains in some areas, work to do in others
I confess, I didn't see the G-Day "game", but I just don't follow these grades. I mean, you're saying Stockton is not as good as Beck based on 1 1/2 games played. He may not be as good as Beck, but I don't think that's something we could know at this point. You brag on last year's offensive line but by any standard or measure, that unit vastly underperformed. I don't believe this year's line has to perform that much better to exceed what last year's group did. And you're giving the secondary big upside based on K.J. Bolden. Though he played well last year, he was far from perfect, and will have to still go some to get to the level of Starks. And based on how you graded the quarterbacks, seems like you would be just as harsh on these (somewhat) unproven DB's. Time will tell about the running backs, but I think Nate Frazier will prove to be better, overall, than Etienne. Granted, Etienne didn't get much help from an underperforming O-Line, but he also didn't look like the guy who used to scare me when we played Florida. I think Frazier, if he learns how to control and channel his emotions, will become a Bulldog great. Go Dawgs!