Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
Comments
Ooooohhh. What a court battle we could have. I would love to be the moderator, offering pithy insights at critical moments in the trial (for the tv audience of course).
No, please tell me how you would stomp me in court by bringing up Anderson's past convictions of sexual battery in the case involving kidnapping, false imprisonment, battery, simple battery, theft by taking and reckless conduct. Remember this is what you have to meet in order for a judge to find it admissible "[Prior crimes] may, however, be admissible for other purposes, including, but not limited to, proof of motive, opportunity, intent, preparation, plan, knowledge, identity, or absence of mistake or accident."
GO FREAKING DAWGS!!!!
Here is something to chuckle over @Bdw3184 , @Hemingwey , and @donniem (and some others in here too) some of y'all might get a little bit tickled over:
That first sentence - 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I am almost certain that is a speckled rock colored egg.
@Pedro 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
that's not a rock. silly.
Well a stone is 14 pounds (6.35 KG in Europe ), so it's clearly not a stone.😁
@donniem Y'all are all killin me!!!! 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Actually that is not a rock…it is a stone
****…I was late to the joke and didn’t read all the way through
Yeah, thank goodness I only do real estate law....😎
Can get tough at times, however......
As usual, you are mis-stating my original remarks (though you may not realize you are doing so), as well as my subsequent comments.
In any event, taking a less argumentative approach… if you read some of the case law, it quickly becomes apparent that the exceptions are much broader than a layman might expect after merely scanning over the statute.
@donniem Maybe take two Advil(s)? Actually, it sounds like even three might be in order.