Home Article commenting
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

Closer look: Why Georgia OL improvement wasn’t enough to win Joe Moore Award

SystemSystem Posts: 11,462 admin
edited December 2022 in Article commenting
imageCloser look: Why Georgia OL improvement wasn’t enough to win Joe Moore Award

ATHENS — The Georgia offensive line works together better than last year’s, but not quite well enough to beat Michigan for the Joe Moore Award this season.

Read the full story here

«1

Comments

  • This content has been removed.
  • edited December 2022
    This content has been removed.
  • Michael_ScarnMichael_Scarn Posts: 1,607 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Of course you're going to dominate the LOS all year when you only play one good team. By contrast Georgia's OL had to face and defeated 6 teams currently ranked in the Top 25.

    This slight will only act as a motivator. My hope is Georgia dispatches ToSu in fine fashion and gives delusional Wolverine fans what they've been clamoring for - a rematch. Be careful of what you wish for!!!

  • GoodOlDawgGoodOlDawg Posts: 506 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    I’m very impressed with what the Dawgs OL has been able to accomplish so far this season. When you consider that they are breaking in a new OL Coach, I think they have exceeded any reasonable expectations.

    the UM - OSU game is usually one of the more high profile games of the season, and even more so this year with both teams going in undefeated. The Michigan OL put on a good performance in that game and it sounds like it was just enough (winning by five votes) to edge out the Dawgs for the JMA.

    There’s not one player on the Dawgs OL that I would trade for Michigan’s best one. These guys play great together, and they’re putting together a run of impressive wins (along with the entire team) that could be historic.

    GO DAWGS!

  • This content has been removed.
  • This content has been removed.
  • Ddavis0777Ddavis0777 Posts: 412 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    Got it, so the recency bias that was generated by beating a highly overrated OSU team win them the award. Michigan loosed 2-3 games if they play in the SEC and gives up 20+ sacks. Period.

  • Bulldawg90Bulldawg90 Posts: 549 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Agree 100%. I know if the same players were on another unnamed SEC team, they win the award. Bad tackling and overloading the line of scrimmage by OSU resulted in 2 long touchdown runs.

    Only one thing left to do…win the whole freakin’ thing.

  • DawgOnTheBeachDawgOnTheBeach Posts: 59 ✭✭✭ Junior

    I believe the Dawgs line is truly more cohesive than last year an probably deserving of the award. However, I have to think the red zone touchdown under performance had to hurt during the final vote.

  • khummelkhummel Posts: 938 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Considering the whole OL room... position depth, ability to plug and play 2-3 deep with no significant drop off... I'd take Georgia over any OL anywhere, any year. Once again, our guys care little about any awards other than team trophies. Go Dawgs!

  • jrmdvm1jrmdvm1 Posts: 137 ✭✭✭ Junior

    The problem with stats is that they don't take into account who those stats were against. Unfortunately stats figure heavily in most awards these days, since it is so hard for "voters" to watch every game. Maybe stats always have been used. That and whatever regional biases exist in the voters. I wonder what the stats for O-line would look like if you factored in the combined d-line performances of the teams those stats were generated against. Even with that, the differences in conferences could also be a factor. The worst SEC team's D-line might have poor stats because of primarily facing SEC competition, but could still be really better than the best team from another conference. It becomes an impossibility to factor everything needed to be objective. And these days, you can't even use post season matchups due to all the opt-outs. I wonder if we hear about that affecting Ohio State when the post-season is over. Unavailability ( for whatever reason ) is a part of football. In the last several years UGA has been without some of their best players for long stretches, but never has made excuses. Even the O-line has enough depth and quality that there hasn't been a noticeable performance hit. The 2's and 3's and beyond have shown the ability to be ready. I can't go so far as to say that we can't be beaten by a good team, but it won't be easy for anyone to beat us in any phase of the game. GO DAWGS!

  • JimWallaceJimWallace Posts: 6,291 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Yawn.

    The only award that counts is won on the field of play.

    I love to hear how the people who give out these awards think about things as is explains a lot; from a certain point of view the only game that matters all year long in college football features Tosu and Big Blue. Twice in two years Tosu has lost to the "best offensive line in the the world," because, well, how could Tosu possibly lose unless Big Blue had the best line in history! See how that works?

    How'd Michigan's line do last season against the only good line of scrimmage they played? If you think that means the Tosu line you're not paying attention to the games.

    I love articles about AntiRatPoison™, so at least there is something of value to the "award."

    Go, Dawgs!

  • This content has been removed.
Sign In or Register to comment.