Home Off Topic
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

COVID-19 Check-in 2.0

1899091929395»

Comments

  • BankwalkerBankwalker ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    That’s not really what I did, and I actually considered your very thought. As such, I tried to avoid results that were out of that time period’s average.

    All of us are aware of how periods have ups and downs for particular days. Outliers. That’s why I gave avg’s for some. Go look at the graphs for yourself. The “data” tells a story.

  • BankwalkerBankwalker ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited August 2020

    Aww, come on. At least give him Vandy - for both reputation and “product on the field.”

  • BankwalkerBankwalker ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited August 2020

    How about taking a look at my last 20-30 posts and tell us all which of the same people over and over are just antagonistically handing out “you know what’s” and then explain why no questioning of their intellectual integrity is allowed?

    The last post above was nothing but a simple explanation of my thoughts, but I’ve already accumulated two of ‘em.

    Yale accused half of the board of being racist without any fallout, yet I took a warning from you for telling a person who attacked me FIRST what I thought of his position, simply because 4 other people who share his ideology decided my response to his comment about “being sick of my drabble” as “too harsh.”

    Yet it is okay for you to call people names, such as “sensitive snowflake.” You’ve also said in an another post “Rules for thee, and none for me.”

    @JeffSentell Can we please make DV’s public again?

This discussion has been closed.