Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
Comments
And rittenberg is alone at the top of the list as the biggest underachiever in sports reporting history..way to go Adam, you're #1 also!
I'm tired of the negative stuff from ESPN. I tune them out until they broadcast SEC games. Then I sync with the radio to avoid the ridiculous stuff they talk about.
So because we haven't gotten past the best coach/dynasty in the modern era we're a bust? GTFOH.
I read the article and What Conner failed to mention is this word for word:
"It's a tough deal, but I think Georgia's the best job in the country, period."
Most coaches would line up to take Smart's job, if available. Georgia is the flagship program in a top talent-producing state, located barely an hour from the Atlanta recruiting hub. Other than LSU, no SEC power is better positioned to dominate a region in recruiting, as Georgia Tech hasn't consistently been a threat despite some stretches of success. Georgia offers strong academics, a fun college town and a strong tradition of producing NFL players.
Then he mentions all the schools surrounding Ga have won a NC except them even with the better resources.
So in reality it’s Connor who is taking the article out of context. By putting this one quote in “Georgia’s failure to win a title puts the program in a tier of its own,” Rittenberg wrote.
There's no doubt that every real fan is tired of coming up short every year (for whatever reason/excuse you want to give it...yadayadayada...) The Dawgs DO need to produce better results. One NC in 40 years ain't cutting it, but I will say this....I wouldn't trade Kirby for almost any other coach out there. I'll be a diehard Dawg fan until I die, and I don't agree with any kind of comparison that puts us in the same tier as Rocky Top! If Smart doesn't produce within the next few years then I may change my tune, but for now I am behind Smart and his program 100% (even though I may not agree with everything Kirby does).
We need to get over the Bama curse and execute like a winning program. No excuses...there IS a LOT riding on this season.
Bulletin board material.
Yes, we've all heard the arguments for why Georgia should have won a title at some point over the past few decades. My point was never to dispute that we should have, or that it's been a stretch punctuated too often with disappointment. But in a class all our own for underachievement? No. As a particularly glaring example, I began following college football in 2001, and for the past two decades I've been hearing what a great program Tennessee has, historically. Ok. Look at where they've been for the last, what, 12 years and counting, set against what a great and storied program they're said to have. You're honestly going to tell me that's not even in the same discussion on underachieving as Georgia's close-but-no-cigar situation?
Dedicating resources goes to program management. And recruiting success is a necessary element to overall success. These things don't just float down gently from the sky into Sanford Stadium. When you look at the overall results, there's at least a few programs out there with similar size, resources, branding etc. as Georgia which aren't positioned as well as we are, haven't been for a while and (some of which) don't look to be any time soon. Whether the fact that they won a national title 15-20+ years ago, to our 41 years, is more important than consistently being good and very nearly great at times is debatable. I just don't see it as stable ground for such a strong conclusion as putting Georgia in a tier all its own.
If the dawgs are tired of all the negative comments. Then they should go out and win
It's ESPN. They can't even stream a whole college football without multiple screen freezes, loss of sound, etc. Pffffffft to their throwing shade at the dogs.......................for not winning the natty EVERY year.