- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
Georgia football podcast: UGA deserves better explanation from SEC regarding controversial call
System
Posts: 11,444 admin
Georgia football podcast: UGA deserves better explanation from SEC regarding controversial call
Georgia football is the No. 1 topic every day on DawgNation Daily — the daily podcast for fans of the national champion Georgia Bulldogs. Catch up on everything happening with UGA athletics with host Brandon Adams and the DawgNation experts as they break down the latest Georgia football recruiting news and discuss coach Kirby Smart’s quest to return the Bulldogs to the top of the college football world. On episode No. 2090 (Dec. 6, 2023) of the podcast, Georgia fans can hear a discussion about what the SEC told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution about the controversial play from near the end of the first half of Saturday’s SEC championship in which Isaiah Bond was ruled to have made a catch which wasn’t reviewed by replay officials despite evidence that the incorrect call was made on the field.
Comments
That catch was not a catch by current rules. No way it was reviewed. There wasn’t enough time as Alabama went hurry up to snap the ball to avoid a review. The non review influenced the outcome of the game. No amount of explanation will change my mind. I know what I saw.
Not only did it influence the result of the game, it influenced the result of the entire season for UGA. That’s the part that will always live with me. And if the Committee was watching, they could have easily agreed and put UGA in the playoffs.
Yep...that's what they were being paid to do.
But, their choices throughout the top 20 indicate they were paying more attention to the hype than the field.
What happens if Texas, Bama, Washington or Michigan lose their QB before the 1st game of the CFP. Injuries happen...contact, non-contact...gettin' in the bathtub.
Are they saying that your invitation to the playoffs hinges on your roster health?......
If that's the case.....UGA would be unbeatable with a healthy roster. Which, they would've had, by the 1st CFP Game. Why didn't the "committee" project THAT, since they obviously projected that FSU didn't have the talent to fix their QB situation in a whole month.
It's unjust and un-American....that's why people of every allegiance and fanbase are outraged at the audacity. To openly pander to the public...without transparency and truthful explanation, is becoming cliche'. And, unacceptable.
There is no way that play was reviewed. This game was too important for it not to have been. Saban seems to get the "benefit of the doubt" in crucial situations.
The fact that they claim they did review when the time allowed makes that physically impossible means they know how badly they blew it and how they, actually, did influence the outcome.
Nothing can be done in regards to the game but there should be some sort of personnel ramifications and a statement.
I would also throw out, our catch that was reviewed shows the fear of the officials that we may come back and win, and they could not allow that. It was so obviously a clean catch but still took a long review (not that there was any question), which shows clear bias.
Yes, we could have played better but we played well enough, in a fair game, to win.
Missed calls against Bama..It's a common occurrence when the DAWGS play them. As much as I despise Joke harbaugh, AND Michigan, I hope Michigan spoils the committee's party by beating bama. And the same happens to Texas against Washington..GoDAWGS!
My favorite part is when people say that both sides had missed calls. Sure, Georgia gets away with an illegal shift on a second and three in the first quarter, whereas Alabama gets a blown offsides call on a punt block or a "catch" on a fourth and four. That don't equal, and the big calls go for the Tide. Remember, in the end Georgia has a younger coach and Saban is retirement age. Let them enjoy another year or two. There soon will be a low Tide.
I have witnessed far too many controversial calls and non-calls benefit Alabama over the years. Especially in the Saban era. I know what I see. The Dawg Nation knows what it sees. We are not paranoid or sore losers. The fact that so many others have reached the same conclusion proves this is not just theory, but fact.
Go Dawgs!
I mentioned in a post leading up to the game that if you believed in conspiracy, that Bama would get a call here or there that would influence the game and allow Saban to retire with one last NATTY.
Many readers on this site gave “down votes” believing our dawgs were going to walk all over Bama. In a fair fight we know the outcome.
WAS IT A FAIR FIGHT??
I’m with you. My only beef is with that last bit, and it’s not really beef. We have this narrative around Satan (family name…) that he’s still got Kirby’s number, and he’s still really the one on top. These sorts of botches that have nothing to do with his coaching will just perpetuate that, and Kirby’s story (national narrative, not our version) becomes “he’s one of the greatest, but he was only ever able to take down his mentor once. It’s really Saban’s retirement that led to the Dawgs’ dominance over the Tide.” That’s probably a way out there thing to think, but I don’t think it’s too far of a reach to think that may be what’s in people’s mouths…
I agree with some of the comments below but definitely not all. The call was unfortunate and seemingly unfair. Yes, its frustrating- especially against our nemesis. But, we had an entire 2nd half to change the eventual outcome and fell short. The Dawgs didn't lose this game because of a missed call at the end of the first half. We had a costly 5 yard penalty that caused Woodring to miss what would have been a made FG. We fumbled on the 11 yard line and Bama made a FG off of it. Those are 2 very costly mistakes in a game lost by 3 points. Bama never turned the ball over. We couldn't stop their running game even though we did better on defense in the 2nd half. We even outscored Bama in the 2nd half. But we couldn't do enough to win the game.
Bad calls are part of the game unfortunately. There were obvious bad calls in the Tech game and other games this season. But we can only control what we can control on the field. Officiating is not one of those things. I do think there needs to be more accountability with the officiating, and if someone can prove Bama bias with officiating then I'm ready to listen. I just don't think that's going to happen.
I would go a step further and say, if they said they didn’t review, while still terrible work on the official’s part, at least that is attributed to an oversight or mistake and I could accept that they are just id1ots. Lying and saying they did is cover-up.
No, I will not get over it.
You have to beat BAMA and the refs! We'll see how it goes in the playoffs. I expect there will be more controversial plays going BAMA's way.
I agree 100% we didn’t get it done on the field. We have to control our destiny. The Saban thing is no myth though. The best way to deal with it is to stamp an L on his forehead on the field!
Go Dawgs!