Home Article commenting
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

KJ Bolden: Why the 5-star safety chose ‘less money’ on the table to flip to Georgia football

2»

Comments

  • BigDawg888BigDawg888 Posts: 1,625 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    I think we are better off without him. Here's why...

    Gunnar has been in the program for 2 years and he knows the offense. After next year (assuming Beck stays healthy and wins us a NC) he will have 3. He will know the offense in and out and gives us 2 years to run it.

    Gunnar gives us the qualities of Stetson Bennett's scrambling and the accuracy and throwing of Beck. Plus he will have the offense mastered.

    This should give us a huge advantage over other teams.

  • BigDawg61BigDawg61 Posts: 2,483 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited December 2023

    Actually, I think Gunner may be better than the "lot" of em. And, I liked more about Puglisi, than Raiola....so, IMO...the Dawgs are "set" at QB.

    UGA may have the most talented, and deepest, QB room they ever had. The "talent and IQ" are there...it just needs more experience and playing time. In my estimation, all 3 QB's will be playing on Sundays one day barring something unforeseeable.

    Bottom line...Raiola possibly had the "Wrong Stuff" for Kirby and his Program. It was a very public break-up...that both Parties would like everyone to believe, "was mutual". The only think is...Kirby barely registered a frown. Which leads me to believe he picked Puglisi over Raiola's considerations.

    So...IMO...Everything worked out for the best, all the way around. I don't see it as a "loss" for UGA...I see it as a loss for Raiola...and, "possibly a "long run win" for Kirby's Program. The only people I hear saying it's a loss for UGA are the talking heads that don't really know anything worth hearing. Lol

Sign In or Register to comment.