Home Article commenting
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

SEC AJC Power Poll: Georgia big winner, panel disagrees with CFP, gives SEC title game hot take

SystemSystem admin
edited November 28 in Article commenting
imageSEC AJC Power Poll: Georgia big winner, panel disagrees with CFP, gives SEC title game hot take

ATHENS — The AJC SEC Power Poll has a bone to pick with the College Football Playoff committee when it comes to the order of league teams.

Read the full story here

Comments

  • MontanaDawgMontanaDawg ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Glad to see this unanimous agreement among the panel about where the loser of the SECCG should go. I especially like Anwar and Kaylee's comments. They are spot on.

    One thing is for certain: MUST beat them Jackets first!!

    GO DAWGS and Happy Thanksgiving to all of DawgNation!

  • Dawg4Dawg4 ✭ Freshman

    After all of the griping about the CFP Committe, these folks have done the EXACT same thing - ranking based on losses . . . There's no other way you can have Texas ranked above Georgia . . .

  • David1David1 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    I agree with them that the SEC title game runner-up should get in the playoffs, but let’s be realistic. Based on the results from this so called playoff committee, I don’t see Georgia getting in the playoffs with a third loss in the SEC title game, regardless of how close it is. With losses to two teams with three losses behind us, at least one of them would be put ahead of Georgia. Anyone remember what happened last season with the loss by 3 in the sec title game? That scenario is still in play.
    Go Dawgs! Wreck tech!

    Happy Thanksgiving!

  • Bdw3184Bdw3184 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited November 28

    I wonder what they would think if the winner of the SECCG is UGA and the loser is now a four-loss aTM ?

    Would/should the committee put them in then?

    Just askin’…..I guess the key would be…..Don’t go into the championship game with more than two losses!

    Go Dawgs! Hate on tech! It’s never too early!

  • 1SICemDAWGS11SICemDAWGS1 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited November 28

    Love seeing Bama out of the playoff picture..GoDAWGS!

  • shamymaxshamymax ✭✭✭ Junior

    If GA finishes 10 and 2, loses the SEC and are left out of the CFP. The SEC should threaten to drop out of the CFP all together. Let's see what that committee does then.

  • Eric_CEric_C ✭✭✭ Junior

    This is a start - "...the runner up should automatically be guaranteed a spot in the playoffs"

    It still doesn't provide a great incentive however as most runner-ups would already have a playoff spot without the game, and they would end up playing an extra game against a physical SEC team while still having to play the first round. The exception would be a team like TAMU this year as they wouldn't make it otherwise.

Sign In or Register to comment.