Home Article commenting
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

Why No. 1-ranked Georgia doesn’t need wake-up call for South Carolina game

SystemSystem Posts: 11,467 admin
edited September 2022 in Article commenting
imageWhy No. 1-ranked Georgia doesn’t need wake-up call for South Carolina game

ATHENS — Georgia lost to South Carolina the last time these teams had a noon kickoff, but there’s no reason to think these Bulldogs need a wake-up call.

Read the full story here

«1

Comments

  • jdatl3jdatl3 Posts: 487 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    The dawgs have a long way to go to reach the top this year. They are very young - and they were pretty bad Saturday. They don't need the rat poison fed to them daily. They need to work hard

  • JimWallaceJimWallace Posts: 6,300 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate


    Bad? Did you watch Alabama, Texas A&M, Notre Dame, etc.

    Yes, the Dawgs need to work hard. As always.

    Go, Dawgs!

  • SmartsTheManSmartsTheMan Posts: 1,543 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    The SC game will be a good test. Like Bama at Texas.

    The Dawgs will be on the road. Hostile crowd - Ga being SC's second biggest rival. SC has a 5-ster QB who's capable of doing some damage. It will be a good test for a young defense.

    We'll see if the Dawgs are better prepared.

  • This content has been removed.
  • DJG76DJG76 Posts: 212 ✭✭✭ Junior

    My prayer every week is that our Lord and Creator bless each player. That each team play to the best of their training and ability and that no player suffer a debilitating injury, and that the best team win the competition. From my observations the past two weeks, the Dawgs will win.

  • reddawg1reddawg1 Posts: 3,881 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    I don't think you can compare Texas to Samford as far as competition level. Texas is an ascending program IMHO. Probably at this stage of the game better than South Carolina. For sure, much, much better than Samford.

  • kirkhilleskirkhilles Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Oh, oh LOL. I misunderstood. You meant a LITERAL wake up call as opposed to what I assumed you meant as in a "wake up call" after last week's snooze-fest on Offense.

    I'm not worried about the time of the game since we were asleep for the 4:00 game last Saturday and that was at home. I'm hoping that we DID get the "wake up call" (I'm sure Bama did) and I'm hoping to see us execute better across the board.

  • kirkhilleskirkhilles Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Yes, people, last week WAS INDEED a bad game. If we had played against a tougher team, it could've easily been a loss. We went 5 out of 13 on 3rd downs. Bennett did decent stat-wise at 24/34 with 300 yards and 1 TD and 0 INT, but compared to a much stronger Oregon team he went 25/31 with 368 yards and 2 TDs. He also had that very bad sack trying to dance away. Beck went 5/7 but had a fumble. Gilbert made another penalty in limited playing time. Only 1 sack, 0 INTs.

    But that's okay, because I'm sure Smart "let them have it" after showing what a low energy practice can relate to the game. I'm predicting that we'll have a much better showing against Carolina.

  • BrooksieBrooksie Posts: 644 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Was Samford a bad game or just a game that wasn’t entertaining? As fans we are not privy to what the coaches were trying to accomplish. I agree that SBIV had a couple of boneheaded mistakes. kind of like watching an older brother toy with his younger sibling-

  • ancelyancely Posts: 87 ✭✭✭ Junior
  • ancelyancely Posts: 87 ✭✭✭ Junior

    Watching the bama game you will see several blatant no calls that gave them the game

  • SmartsTheManSmartsTheMan Posts: 1,543 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Indeed! The most puzzling - how many non-calls for PI against the Bama secondary in the first quarter - when Ewers was shredding the secondary - took at least one TD off the board. Then - as if the officials got a call from someone and at the same time as Ewers was knocked out of the game - the officials started calling PI the way they should've been doing it the whole game.

    Yet, another game where Bama was helped by the officials. Boy does that happen a lot!

  • MobileDawgMobileDawg Posts: 337 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    Not to mention the Bryce Young effect, kinda eerie how his fumbles always seem to be overturned as incomplete passes and a missed facemask call which would have given Texas a first and goal instead of having to kick a field goal.

Sign In or Register to comment.