Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
Comments
I understand having the crown of the helmet rule and launching, and spearing, however I just saw 2 football players making plays. I saw shoulders being struck, and when you strike a shoulder you can't help but get some of the helmet too! Football is a tough, physical game, but they are almost making it flag football. The replay refs should consider was there intent to destroy someone or just a player trying to tackle the other guy who often times is lowering his head at the last second, which often initiates the helmet to helmet contact inadvertently.
My comment to the University of Texas football and its fans...you cannot come to the SEC in your first year crying. There is no crying in SEC football.
a real fine Mr. Sankey, would be to make them travel to Bama, Georgia, and Ole Miss and Tenn at home, like you made Georgia play this year.
The fine is a joke but if the SEC is seriously interested in this never happening again, it's a simple fix…..if it happens again the team forfeit's the remainder of the years home games and must travel or forfeit the game…..now that's a financial penalty that will get instant results. A second violation results in a year forfeiture of home games.
there were many questionable calls and no calls in the game. Both targeting penalties were just the more devastating of them for Georgia. The suspensions should be reversed given the offensive players had time to lower their heads prior to contact. I won’t hold my breath for the league office to do the right thing.
Have people seen the official statement from the SEC about the refs doing the "right thing" (according to the ESPN "rules expert")? Completely omits the fact that there was a four minute delay to account for the Texas-sized temper tantrum before the call was reversed. Puts the focus squarely on the crowd's reaction, as if that was the only thing that went wrong there. Nothing surprising at all about that. But it's worth calling attention to.
just read this clown head official lives in Texas… Shocker
Lol...NIL and other side interests of the Football Program...will cover this "one-time fee" for throwing a Fan'trum. Well worth it....if it gets you a win, you would otherwise, not have.
Coaches can build that strategy into their Program. The penalty is acceptable, considering the reward. Lol. Only, 1 per Season.
Massive fine? $250000—chump change for the University of Texas. You would make a great weatherman, Conner!
Not a bad idea. But probably too extreme for most people to agree to. The logistics surrounding ticketing, scheduling and traveling would make it very difficult. But it would serve the unruly fans right.
You want to stop fans throwing trash on the field or storming the field after? Don't have the fines pocketed by the SEC. Have the fine money put into the opposing teams NIL fund.
Yeah, I mean, when tearing your OWN goal posts down (which is basically unofficially allowed by the school) is a $100k fine, saying that $250k is a "massive fine" is pretty laughable.
Not a bad idea on banning alcohol, but I would personally do something more meaningful and memorable. For their next home game vs Florida, void all Student tickets. No preventing students from attending, just void the tickets and cover the entire student section so no one can sit there.
One person doing something is unavoidable, but many full water bottles? That is a SERIOUS failure in security. We shouldn't have been the cleanup crew, we should've seen a dozen security guards actively ARRESTING people in the stands. Music should've been turned off, lighting effects and any "home field advantage" should've been removed.
If Georgia fans did this, I would be so heartbroken… just really, really awful.
Is there a rule that reviews must be initiated within a certain amount of time … say one minute (real time, not game-clock time)? If not, there ought to be.
I can see why they decided it was offensive interference. In fact, it's good for Georgia not to have an asterisk on this win. But Sankey's not addressing the problem that the officials have now incentivized this kind of behavior — and $250,000 doesn't even come close to disincentivizing it.
Technically...at the point the decision was made....the booth had more than enough time to review the play. If it was a play susceptible to review....the booth would've initiated it.
As far as i know....The officials on the field, do not have the authority to initiate a review or reverse a call that is considered non-reviewable by rule.....after the call is made, ball is spotted and ready for play.
The Referee's "change of heart" occurred after that and the bottle shower....while they were gathered up, shooting the breeze. Minutes after the ball was signaled ready for play.
I don't know what you do about something like this....I've never seen it before. Lol...and, they thought a "Challenge & Review Process" would eliminate most of the controversy surrounding referees.
If you ask me…it's gotten much worse. Maybe the Officials they're putting on the field, these days are under-qualified.
The thinking being....'With all those extra eyes on a play, Replay Officials and Challenge Flags....you don't need a great group of officials on the field....you need a great group of cameras with a qualified Booth Official.'
Well...It ain't workin'. We've got some of the worst officiating, from top to bottom...in the history of Football, in general. Officials are making some calls, they know may be wrong....counting on the eye-in-the-sky to keep it real. If the camera, Booth or Coach doesn't catch the bad call in time.…no review. Bad call lives on.
In the Texas case....all of the protocols were bypassed, to ensure the Home Team didn't kill em over a Bad Call.
Did the Officials feel threatened?....And, then changed the call? Did they feel, they were being extorted by the crowd. Lol....Maybe, they should've cleared the stadium in the area the bottles were flying from, to finish the game, safely.
Here's a question, nobody's askin'....
[if the Replay Official is there to monitor the game for replay review and adherence to the rules......WHY didn't they buzz down to tell the Field Judge that changing that call was NOT an option.
I'll tell ya why..…the Booth Official and TV announcers, were the ones that told the field judge...."they got the call wrong". They changed the call, in direct violation of the rules governing "Penalty Review and Challenge" protocols.
Pass Interference....Offensive or Defensive....is a "Judgment Call" on the part of the official....given various checkpoints and specific criterion. That official's judgment is the final word.
That's WHY it's NOT REVIEWABLE.....even if that Official, realizes he screwed his team by making the call....and....has a change of heart 5 minutes later.
Lol...Bul'logna....if the Official had known at the time, that Texas was gonna intercept it....he would've kept his flag in his pocket, or called Offensive PI. Give him a break.…he was trying to appear unbiased. He just picked an unfortunate...[for Texas].…time to do it. Lmao