Home Article commenting
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

Catching up on proposed changes to college football, House vs. NCAA

SystemSystem admin
edited May 14 in Article commenting
imageCatching up on proposed changes to college football, House vs. NCAA

ATHENS — Collegiate athletics is ready to move forward, needs to move forward, and is supposedly on the verge of moving forward via the House vs. NCAA settlement.

Read the full story here

Comments

  • EastmandawgEastmandawg ✭✭✭ Junior

    The strong will survive.

    It will probably go down from 129 teams or whatever the number is to 25 or so in time. It will also limit numbers for those that want to play & get an education.

    Sad what may be to come, hope I’m wrong.

  • BrooksieBrooksie ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    I would like to get rid of the CFP committee and use the AP poll for the playoffs. No guaranteed spots. BUT have the top 24 teams be a part of the playoffs. And maybe even having 2 play-in games with 26 vs 24 and 23 vs 25. In reality, will any team outside of the top 15 really have a chance to get to the natty?

  • GtheGreekGtheGreek ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    The only difference for me would be to combine the AP and Coaches Poll to determine rank…definitely can the CFP….if we had a 24 team playoff would yield 12 then 6 the 3 winners, the #1 team gets a buy to play the winner of 2 & 3 for the Natty.

    Unlimited scholarships where if you make the team your you're in but don't limit rosters/walk ons…..allow all open fair market deals for individual players….divide the NIL cap according to starts/playing time with a base amount going to every player…..Ban boosters and collectives from paying players but allow contributions to schools/programs….No TP for players for first two years, then only one window after the schools spring practice….

Sign In or Register to comment.