Home Article commenting
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

Kaiden Prothro: UGA overcame ‘significant offer’ from SEC rival for 5-star

SystemSystem Posts: 12,633 admin
edited August 19 in Article commenting
imageKaiden Prothro: UGA overcame ‘significant offer’ from SEC rival for 5-star

Welcome to "Sentell's Intel" where Jeff Sentell not only provides you the latest recruiting information, he takes you into the homes of these students and what makes them special to the Georgia program.

Read the full story here

Comments

  • VenomGAVenomGA Posts: 614 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    He would be DANGEROUS as a WR at UGA!

  • LoranwhaddayagotLoranwhaddayagot Posts: 2,145 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Will we only have Noah Thomas for this year? I hope they use his height a lot!

  • ColumbusDawgColumbusDawg Posts: 592 ✭✭✭✭ Senior
  • NorthHallDawgNorthHallDawg Posts: 139 ✭✭✭ Junior

    Don't count Texas out. We know from experience that they always come in at the last minute with a big bag to sway the recruit. I suspect this will happen in Prothro's case and then we'll see how good his word is…

  • ChawlieDawg88ChawlieDawg88 Posts: 70 ✭✭✭ Junior

    I agree with navydawg about kids that want to develop and the ones that want the money now. Pro teams praise the players coming out of UGA for the way they already know how to work at practice. It's just hard for some of these families that really need the NIL money and just see that immediate payday.Those are the players we'll miss out on.You really can't blame these kids but it's a shame the families just jump at the biggest payday now.

  • lucydoglucydog Posts: 456 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    If "money" is not an important aspect, then why even bring up the "significant offer"? All of us fans have seen the proclamations from these families and these recruits about the only thing that's important is "the team, the coaches, and the school—and not the money"—-only to have them jump ship for a payday at some other school. I'm not saying that Kaiden Prothro is like that—he seems to be resolute in his commitment, but you never know until the bag man shows up from Texas!

  • UGADad20UGADad20 Posts: 2,328 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    I think you are right. The money is #1. Can't say I blame them. This kind of money is life changing and has probably never been seen before by any of these families.

    The question is what will be the impact of these new rules (% payout to players/sports, Salary cap, NIL clearing house, etc) be? Will that level the playing field and provide transparency?

    Two programs (TX, Mia) seem to be targeting UGA recruits, knowing UGA is selling development over money, and coming in with a bigger bag. So far, under the current rules, their strategy seems to be working. TX is 3 for 4 w/5*'s vs UGA this cycle. Rule changes can't get here soon enough.

  • RedUga4EverRedUga4Ever Posts: 50 ✭✭✭ Junior

    The question is what will be the impact of these new rules (% payout to players/sports, Salary cap, NIL clearing house, etc) be? Will that level the playing field and provide transparency?

    There are no controls on the collectives. That is where all the oil money resides!

  • UGADad20UGADad20 Posts: 2,328 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited August 20

    You are correct from what I have heard. BUT ANY NIL deal over $600 needs to be cleared.

    "NIL deals valued at $600 or more must be cleared through a third-party clearinghouse system called NIL Go, which is overseen by the College Sports Commission (CSC). This system, managed by Deloitte, is designed to verify the legitimacy of these deals and ensure they align with fair market value, preventing NIL deals from circumventing revenue-sharing rules ", AI.

    The way I read that is that each player's "deal" is evaluated for validation vs value/worth AND that the composite (team) values of these NIL deals can't(?) exceed the total (salary cap) of the amount committed to revenue sharing. Still a lot to be decided/communicated. But seems to support a system that levels the playing field and attempts to check out of control talent buying.

    Probably means a return to paying players under the table. The difference now vs, say, the '80's is the sophistication of banking record keeping and money tracking protocols currently in use in the US.

Sign In or Register to comment.