Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
Georgia football winners and losers after Orange Bowl triumph over Michigan
System
Posts: 11,472 admin
Georgia football winners and losers after Orange Bowl triumph over Michigan
Georgia football earned a commanding 34-11 win over Michigan in the Orange Bowl.
Comments
To those who say "some of today's players don't love the game as much as player's did in the good ole days."
Go back 25 years and put the same amount of money on the table and many of those players would opt out too.
Nobody should expect draft eligible players to play in anything other than play-off games. That is just being selfish on the coaches and fan's part.
IDK, do NFL players get to opt out for “meanless” games? Real question.
Perhaps CFB needs to take a look at installing some revised rules to govern player participation, NIL, the portal, etc.?
Thanks Connor for a good article and for giving Stetson the credit he so much deserves…..something your colleague (MG) will never do. I’d challenge anyone to name a “back-up” QB who has contributed more to our program over 2 years. He started off by saving us against Arkansas last year and continued his winning ways this season. Go Dawgs and great job Mailman!!!
Some people might not think that's a fair question, given NFL players are paid millions to play whenever healthy. But at a school like UGA, the annual value of a scholly is at least $100K (i.e., food, nutrition, housing, training facilities, orthopedes, PTs, rehab resources, equipment, skills coaches, counselors, exposure to scouts, press, tutors, college education, etc.), all geared toward preparing that young man to be at his very best so he might become good enough to later earn those millions. In fact, if you paid for that a la carte, it'd be well-beyond $100K/year.. not bad "pay" for a teenager. But I certainly get both sides of this tension, which will likely increase as the stakes go higher. Go Dawgs!
I’d point out that the chance for players to develop and prove themselves in college for a chance at millions in the NFL is worth… … … millions?
Players want to play. They don't want to spend much time as a backup. The transfer portal should help bring some parity to the world of recruiting and where elite players end up - spreading that talent around the league and helping teams get better. We've seen that happening already. Also, an expanded playoff should help the landscape as well.
To an extent, yes. Players will stick around and wait if they feel that their prospects for playing in the NFL will improve by staying where they are or, conversely, they might leave when playing already if they think they can improve their draft status by changing schools. Alabama is a good example of this.
Could someone explain this comment to me. I seriously have no clue.
Go, Dawgs!
Tell me again how Alabama cherry picking 4 4-5* players from the transfer portal has helped CFB competitive balance? The TP will be a free agency way for the top programs to cherry pick players to fill holes. Every year. UGA picked up 3 in 2 seasons. Unfortunately 2 of the 3 have had injury issues. Do you realize which UGA player was top rated in the preseason list of the top 100 players in CFB? Tykee Smith. Would've been nice to have him this week. Still trying to figure out how a transfer sitting out a season of competition but still getting free tuition, housing, education, tutoring, training table and facilities, best medical care, coaching to improve play, maturation, etc etc is a bad thing? Removing the transfer rule has destabilized college sports. Loose/ non existent NIL "rules" will result in recruits being paid to attend certain schools.
These 2 semi final games are a good argument against playoff expansion. If teams 3 and 4 are this overmatched who wants to see teams 5-12? Totally against a 12 team playoff. Against the top 4 teams getting byes. The week off will create an insurmountable advantage for those 4 teams. The ONLY reason to expand to 12 teams is for money. Pure greed. If these games were non competitive imagine how non competitive the games will be with expansion.
I know it would happen because it did. Our very own Herschel Walker was one of the pioneers of opting out of your senior season to go play for guys like Donald Trump.
Been done a million times with 0 flags thrown. Pretty sure they're in the clear.
I've got some thoughts on the whole opting out topic, but I'll focus on one talking point that's been bugging me lately. It came up yesterday when I was talking to my brother and I just saw it again in the article: "Bowl games are exhibition games."
No. They're not. And saying that they are frames the entire debate under a false premise. Bowl games count on a team's record, just like every other game they play throughout the season. They officially matter. All star games are exhibitions. Pre-season games (NFL, college spring games) are exhibitions. Ever notice how no one cares when star players sit out of or limit their participation in those? Because exhibition games don't count for anything, and don't matter.
What's at issue here is that games that count are being treated as exhibition games. That's the whole reason this debate exists. So saying that bowl games are exhibitions either is completely disingenuous or demonstrates a profound lack of understanding of the topic.
Like I said, I have some other thoughts on the subject, but will leave it at that for now. There's nothing wrong with having a debate on things that people are passionate about. But that debate still needs to be had on legitimate terms. Calling bowl games exhibition games is objectively not valid.
From what I understand, Bama just picked off Tech’s best player thanks to the portal. He is now predicted to be in the Heisman hunt next year. I don’t see how this helps the integrity of CFB.