Home Off Topic
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

My demands for DRob

13»

Comments

  • judasdurantjudasdurant ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @levander said:
    Wow, it’s pretty amazing how ready some UGA fans are to throw their existing guys under the bus. Could care less about the receivers who’ve been here working the whole time, there for the team. Completely ready to diminish their playing time because they believe a guy from another school (that might play here only one year) is better than them.

    This is why mark richt lasted 15 years at uga. Stop being such a **** and embrace winning

  • DawgboneDawgbone ✭✭ Sophomore

    Uh oh Lou, Drob has a top 4 list.

  • SWARLES_BARKLEYSWARLES_BARKLEY ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    Levander wants only the minimum necessary depth at a position. Where do you want to distribute the 85 roster spots, then? Because if we didn’t recruit Fields (which was just so unfair to Fromm) then we would have ended up with another guy in another position group. What about those starters? Are they as emotionally fragile? It’s okay to make them compete? Or are we supposed to intentionally recruit lower talented guys?

    What kind of fragile, spineless, selfish children do you think comprise the roster? These guys chose Georgia because of the competition with other elite talent, not despite it. You want Georgia to have an inferior roster so that whoever earns a starting job did so more comfortably. That’s the sorriest representation of the sport I can think of and flies in the face of organized athletics.

  • brentwilsonbrentwilson ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @SWARLES_BARKLEY said:
    Levander wants only the minimum necessary depth at a position. Where do you want to distribute the 85 roster spots, then? Because if we didn’t recruit Fields (which was just so unfair to Fromm) then we would have ended up with another guy in another position group. What about those starters? Are they as emotionally fragile? It’s okay to make them compete? Or are we supposed to intentionally recruit lower talented guys?

    What kind of fragile, spineless, selfish children do you think comprise the roster? These guys chose Georgia because of the competition with other elite talent, not despite it. You want Georgia to have an inferior roster so that whoever earns a starting job did so more comfortably. That’s the sorriest representation of the sport I can think of and flies in the face of organized athletics.

    definitely want lots of guys at every position because it forces them to be competitive and work hard in games and practices.

  • levanderlevander ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @SWARLES_BARKLEY said:
    Levander wants only the minimum necessary depth at a position. Where do you want to distribute the 85 roster spots, then? Because if we didn’t recruit Fields (which was just so unfair to Fromm) then we would have ended up with another guy in another position group. What about those starters? Are they as emotionally fragile? It’s okay to make them compete? Or are we supposed to intentionally recruit lower talented guys?

    What kind of fragile, spineless, selfish children do you think comprise the roster? These guys chose Georgia because of the competition with other elite talent, not despite it. You want Georgia to have an inferior roster so that whoever earns a starting job did so more comfortably. That’s the sorriest representation of the sport I can think of and flies in the face of organized athletics.

    Swarles, your post reeks of stupidity. I got to the 3rd incorrect assumption and just stopped reading.

  • levanderlevander ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @judasdurant said:

    @levander said:
    Wow, it’s pretty amazing how ready some UGA fans are to throw their existing guys under the bus. Could care less about the receivers who’ve been here working the whole time, there for the team. Completely ready to diminish their playing time because they believe a guy from another school (that might play here only one year) is better than them.

    This is why mark richt lasted 15 years at uga. Stop being such a **** and embrace winning

    There’s a lot of room between what Richt did and what Kirby is doing. Kirby is closer to getting it right. But just like any way you’ll choose to do such a complicated job, there are dangers involved.

  • BigDawgEatinBigDawgEatin ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
  • levanderlevander ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @BigDawgEatin Is it that you don’t think Kirby is closer than Richt to getting it right? Is it that’s you don’t think there are dangers to be wary of any way you try to coach an elite college football program? Or I am just like the 20th guy on the board you’ve decided you want to try to annoy with inane posts?

Sign In or Register to comment.