Home Article commenting
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

Georgia football stock report: Kirby’s cliches resonate, new stars emerging

SystemSystem Posts: 11,470 admin
edited September 2021 in Article commenting
imageGeorgia football stock report: Kirby’s cliches resonate, new stars emerging

ATHENS — A couple of Kirby Smart cliches came to mind in evaluating and summing up where Georgia football stands entering Week 3, as both explain personnel decisions and strategy.

Read the full story here

«1

Comments

  • GardenDawgGardenDawg Posts: 312 ✭✭✭ Junior

    I said it last week and it continues to ring true. Tindall is special!

  • reddawg1reddawg1 Posts: 3,882 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Tindall is emerging as a star.

  • dogs_n_bravesdogs_n_braves Posts: 121 ✭✭✭ Junior

    McIntosh looked like the best back . . . because he is the best back. Consider the ability of the others just offers context for his talent.

  • UGA66UGA66 Posts: 4,317 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    The RBs puzzle me to some degree.....different backs performing at different levels game to game. The most consistent are Kenny M. and Zeus. Milton got boxed. They are very good backs just not great....yet. This next SC match-up should open up the run game. Also, if JT starts, I would think he would want to post some big numbers in the air to let people know: "I am back." Besting the "mailman's" UAB effort will taker some doing. He ciphered the UAB defense and picked it apart. I was impressed. He could easily start against SC and win that contest. BUT...JT needs to get back into the game's rhythm, which I believe he can and will do. Down the road UGA will face much stiffer competition in Arkansas, Auburn and Florida. Many outsiders have said that UGA has an easy schedule....maybe easier...but not easy.

  • JimDawg85JimDawg85 Posts: 375 ✭✭✭ Junior

    I blame the fill-in hosts on 680 The Fan Saturday morning for starting all of the b.s. about Kirby playing games with the back-up QB and "disrespecting" Beck if he didn't get the start. Some of these commentators on their new morning show don't have a clue and unfortunately, Georgia's own Hudson Mason is chief among them.

  • reddawg1reddawg1 Posts: 3,882 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    I would have loved to seen what our backs could have done with holes or lanes opened up like the UAB backs had at times. Be nice to every once in a while get through the line of scrimmage without being touched. Our backs have to wonder what that is like. Ithought we were Running BAck U?

    That has been my biggest concern coming into this season, can we have a dominate run game? If we can't then we're not beating BAMA being one dimensional. THeir front 3/4 are as good as ours.

  • BassDawgBassDawg Posts: 125 ✭✭✭ Junior

    I would say stock soaring for Brock Bowers too.

  • BassDawgBassDawg Posts: 125 ✭✭✭ Junior
  • E_RocE_Roc Posts: 1,316 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited September 2021

    "But as the game played out, it became apparent why Smart is in charge and fans were put in their place..."

    Well, depending on who you're referring to here, I think that's kind of a harsh take. I can only speak for myself (though I get the impression I'm not alone on this) when I say the objection to the announcement that Bennett would start had more to do with the messaging around it than the actual coaching decision. Smart could have said from the beginning something like, We've got Stetson Bennet, who we are comfortable with. He knows the offense and is generally a capable quarterback. Carson Beck is coming along, but will need real game experience to develop into the quarterback we want him to be. So for the time being, Bennett will remain the #2 and will fill in when we need a reliable quarterback, and we're going to look to give Beck as many chances as we can to get in there as well. If he had made these intentions clear from the beginning, I don't think there would have been nearly the uproar that there was. I know I wouldn't have minded it (and I've acknowledged a couple times since the game ended that starting Bennett was indeed the right move). Even those who generally disagree with the decision would have at least had an explanation going into the game, and time to process it. Instead, we were told something very different.

    It's often pointed out, including in this situation, that the coaches have access to a lot of information that the fans simply don't. How players look in practice, how they're managing the playbook, how engaged they are, how they interact with their teammates, etc. And of course this is true. So when we were told that Beck was the #2, it gave the distinct impression that the coaches had taken all of this into account and thought they had in him a quarterback who was ready to be thrown into a game, come what may. And when that abruptly changed, it gave the impression that they had a guy with more upside than Bennett, who THEY thought was ready for this moment, but when the time came, they began to second guess their own assessment and decided to go with the safe pick instead. And if they're unsure about starting the guy that they had previously made clear was next in line, what exactly does that mean for the rotation in general? How much time would Beck even get? All this uncertainty started swirling, and it was all (for me anyway) because of how the decision was managed, not the decision itself.

    If you want to call it gamesmanship, that's fine. I'm sure Smart has his reasons. But you also can't be surprised when people react a certain way in real time to being mislead.

  • iamaugafaniamaugafan Posts: 23 ✭✭ Sophomore

    I am very happy for our Dawgs. I am also happy for Sam Pittman. He is doing great things at Arkansas. I despise the Gaytors and don't really care for Auburn... but, we need their status to rise so we can let everyone know when we spank them it will be no accident.

    Humbly encouraged!😎

  • JimWallaceJimWallace Posts: 6,311 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate


    Misled by "coach speak?"

    Kirby is not telling you and me anything other than what he means to be telling others - such as the coaches of our opponents - and we have no right to expect otherwise. In fact, we hope he keeps his cards close to the chest, bluffs when he should, and keeps 'em confused.

    We have no idea what he tells the players or what they do and don't know, but it's likely they know more than us as they see what happens in the rooms and on the field.

    Go, Dawgs!

  • E_RocE_Roc Posts: 1,316 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited September 2021

    You and I have very different definitions of coach speak.

    And as I acknowledged in my first post, it's fine if Smart sees this sort of tactic as a tool. But it also means you're going to have people reacting to false information.

  • Bigjohnson92Bigjohnson92 Posts: 564 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    Yep. Couldn’t agree more. Our current running game (lack of) is eerily similar to Coleys. No holes opening up. Just running straight into tacklers or straight into the butts of our OL.

  • Bigjohnson92Bigjohnson92 Posts: 564 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    Agreed. No holes for rbs. Seems like the defense is in our huddle for running plays. Too predictable maybe?

  • SmartsTheManSmartsTheMan Posts: 1,543 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    It's not complicated.

    Two weeks ago Kirby named Beck as the No.2. Now every DC has to plan for Beck along with Daniels.

    Meanwhile, Monken's developing Beck and Bennett's getting even better at the game. Both Bennett and Beck stay focused and engaged.

    Put another way, two weeks ago Kirby likely had no idea that he would have to spring the Bennett surprise on UAB, as he was likely thinking if Daniels couldn't start or if he got knocked out of a game it could be against Auburn or Mizzou or Florida. If the Bennett surprise had happened against Florida, etc. that team wouldn't have been as prepared on defense.

    Kirby's thinking three steps ahead. We fan's are just trying to keep up. As it should be!

Sign In or Register to comment.