Home Article commenting
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

Brock Bowers forgoes collective, passes on hundreds of thousands of dollars for Georgia teammates

2»

Comments

  • zonadawg61zonadawg61 Posts: 460 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    THE LEGEND GROWS...

  • JimDawg85JimDawg85 Posts: 374 ✭✭✭ Junior

    i believe what we are seeing is that the collective is primarily for paying players who can’t get individual deals. If you are a star like Brock or Stetson, you can command big NIL money individually. Collective money can go to fund a stipend for a position group like say, the offensive line. Obviously because the O-line is a big group, each player is going to get less, but everyone is getting something. There can be individual stars in just about every position group. Jordan Davis became a fan favorite as a DL, and they will be able to get individual NIL deals worth much more. But the rest of the group can get collective deals. Make sense?

  • BigDawg61BigDawg61 Posts: 2,587 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited February 2023

    Are you saying that, you are limited to an "either/or, but not both" decision?

    If that's the case...Stetson Bennett did the same thing Bowers is doing...last year. If Bennett earned "over 1 million dollars in non-NIL money" in '21 and the rule is as inferred by me...then Bennett couldn't take money from the "Collective" last year...for the same reason Bowers can't take money from the "Collective", this year.

    Where was the love for Stetson Bennett, when he did it. Lol...nevermind, Dawg Nation. We know.

    I don't know how all this works. It's all changing so fast, it's hard to keep up. Especially, when ya don't really care. Lol

    I didn't think they could put limits on the source and amount of income a player gets...as long as it's legal, obviously. Lol

    Unless, maybe it's a "Collective" rule.

    If that's the case...I completely understand why Bowers, did what he did.

    Otherwise...Why not take the big(ger) chunk of money the "Collective" gives you...and distribute it among the deserving players, yourself. Get your money from non-NIL sources.

  • robinsdawgrobinsdawg Posts: 125 ✭✭✭ Junior

    I thought i had a good grasp of the whole NIL deal, but the "collective" has me lost. I'd like to see an article on the "collective"; how does it use a player's Name, Image and Likeness?

Sign In or Register to comment.