Home Article commenting
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

Georgia football winners and losers following season-ending loss to Ole Miss

2

Comments

  • MaxMax Posts: 293 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    Ouch! (the photo w/Branch & Colbie breaking open). Either looks to be better option than Delp, who to your point is almost out of EZ & in a tighter window. You throw it up & near Colbie - TD! Hit Branch breaking - TD!

  • MaxMax Posts: 293 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    Maybe we really could use a Raiola or Curtis type?? Not saying them individually, but I'm not going to dismiss us losing 5* QBs anymore as not important. Not only do we miss 2 better options on last TD pass attempt, I keep seeing replays/photos of open downfield receivers where it appears we don't even notice (Branch especially on a crucial play). And it seems like these conversations on QB missing open receivers happened all season - all the way to the last game.

  • MontanaDawgMontanaDawg Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited January 5

    @1SICemDAWGS1….I don't disagree with you, because honestly, as they say, stats are for losers. So, I take it all with a grain of salt. BUT, it does show trends and areas where improvement is needed. And we certainly need better offensive production.

    All I know is Indiana impresses the heck out of me on both sides of the ball. They handled Ohio State in a tough fight, and they destroyed a Bama team - supposedly a playoff worthy, top SEC team - like they were an FCS team or scrimmage team. They have proven their worth with a large amount of G5 players. That tells me that their coaching staff and culture is top notch.

    And if the SEC is such a better conference with tougher opponents - WHY has the B1G won the last (2) National Championships (an SEC team wasn't even in either final game) and poised to possibly win a 3rd???

    I think we can all throw that SEC "It just means more" stuff out the window at this point….not until we start proving it again on the field. If Ole Miss miraculously wins the next (2) games then we are all fools and Lane Kiffin is the winner (big Bonus whether he is there or not) !

  • KBPKBP Posts: 419 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    Does losing a game always mean you were outcoached? I think that is one of the most overrated statements in sports regardless of who makes it. I really wish Coach Smart had been asked for examples of being outcoached because what I saw was being outplayed.

  • 1SICemDAWGS11SICemDAWGS1 Posts: 3,192 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited January 5

    I agree completely, the SEC no longer reigns as the top dog ( unless Ole Miss can run the table and break that big10 streak at 2 titles), thats hard to admit, but the truth is the truth. NIL helped a lot in leveling that playing field for everyone, and brought parity to the game. No doubt that Indiana has a very good team. But, I never thought i'd live to see the day when they were the top team in the big10 lol

  • reddawg1reddawg1 Posts: 4,407 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Indiana, it will be hard to deny them the NC. Best QB, best coach(this season), really good receiver and RB's, a (badass defense). Team is loaded with 3rd and 4th year players(maturity). 19 Juniors and Seniors on the starting 22! Reminds me of Michigan when they won it a couple of years ago when they had so many draft eligible players return.

  • 76junkyarddawg76junkyarddawg Posts: 61 ✭✭✭ Junior

    best team money can buy. Not denying Cignetti is a good coach, but google how much Indiana spent on football in last two years. Guess we have to decide which model we prefer - recruit kids who want to play for UGA and build, or hire mercenaries. Kiffin turned ole miss roster over totally with portal last 2-3 years. He was churning 60-70 players every year. Was curious so I looked up ole miss starters on offense and defense for Sugar Bowl - 3 players recruited out of high school on offense and 4 on defense. Key subs on both sides of ball also transfers. To some extent, we and other SEC schools are starting to get left behind in NIL arms race. For example, #1 rated portal QB from Cincinnati was being recruited hard by Kiffin to LSU but just committed to oil baron university aka Texas tech for a rumored $5 million dollar deal. For the record, I prefer Kirby’s model, but the playing field is getting tilted by mega donors at other schools.

  • MontanaDawgMontanaDawg Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited January 5

    @Kudzu and @76junkyarddawg…Good points. Unfortunately, with the rules of the game changing, more parity, teams like Wisconsin flipping star players that were committed to Bama (just an example of the craziness that is going on we never saw before), NIL, big money in the game, it will be A) Harder to repeat as National Champion and B) tougher to stay an elite team above the rest. It's getting more crowded in the top tier, and honestly, the SEC finding more parity means that there is slimmer differences in ability in most teams. And you obviously need more lady luck than you did before.

    What are the differentiating factors?

    I'd say Coaching and Development. Doing the fundamentals and executing better than anyone else. And that is what Cignetti harps on and bases his coaching on more than anything. I keep going back to Indiana, because we have never seen this kind of turnaround in the history of college football. It just doesn't happen, yet it has. Ohio State dominated in the playoffs last season, and honestly, I think Indiana may do the same. God, I would love to see the Dawgs tear up the competition like the Buckeyes did last season and Indiana is doing now.

    Recruiting is still where Kirby will spend his time and money. He won't be going the Kiffin route. And like Ohio State did, spend most of the Dawg's money on retention of key players than paying for transfers. But, you gotta fill key holes in your lineup with playmakers. We simply do not have near enough true playmakers.

  • MontanaDawgMontanaDawg Posts: 2,708 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @reddawg1…Yes, a lot of G5 players Cignetti brought with him from JMU and that came from elsewhere (incl. Maryland). Just shows you what coaching and development can do for a team…along with that experience. It will be interesting to see if this Indiana team is once and done or can they somehow reload and be as competitive??

  • EastmandawgEastmandawg Posts: 682 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited January 5

    Concur…I too rather have Kirby’s model, thinks the other model is not sustainable long term.

    Hit the NIL for what you need that year for the shortcomings…and if you have recruited well, it should be very little.

    The SEC is not easy and will not get any easier with the 9 game schedule - but I am pretty sure the other conferences love it. It would be great to have your full team standing & healthy at the end of the year.

    All plays don’t work, no coach/coaches are 100% correct all the time, very rare that teams win all games and sometimes the better team wins. But with just over half the team being freshmen & sophomores…..thinks.Kirby and staff did an incredible job. Would want no one different running my program.

    How rare is it to win as much as Georgia has won since he’s been there?? Who has won more games the last 5 years in college football than he has that is active??

    The writer of this article calling Kirby a “loser” is in fact the one that is the loser…even putting the word “loser” in the headline.

    He really doesn’t understand the game, thinks if the play doesn’t work, it’s the call, only writes what he reads for the most part from others. It’s always whichever way the wind blows for him. The only thing he seems to be good at is being a troll - and even that is debatable, a 10 year old could do it.

    The writer is grasping to hang on and failing at it miserably.

    When considering all - we have a bunch of winners on this team…and that starts from the top.

Sign In or Register to comment.