Home Article commenting
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

Kirby Smart makes it clear money isn’t an issue for Georgia when it comes to adding top talent

SystemSystem Posts: 14,168 admin
edited July 22 in Article commenting
imageKirby Smart makes it clear money isn’t an issue for Georgia when it comes to adding top talent

TAMPA, Fla. — Kirby Smart made his thoughts loud and clear when it comes to Georgia’s ability to acquire talent.

Read the full story here

«1

Comments

  • jamboogiejamboogie Posts: 425 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    content with the answers nut one more question to be asked. we used to score one or two players from JuCo ranks. are we missing out by not looking in that direction anymore?

  • BigDawg888BigDawg888 Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
  • BigDawg888BigDawg888 Posts: 2,006 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Lane Kiffin found Trinidad Chambliss for Ole Miss. We need to start looking for next years qb. Not sure any of the guys on the roster are talented enough or experienced enough. I do like Beaver though but he's 5th team qb.

  • MontanaDawgMontanaDawg Posts: 2,911 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @BigDawg888…Agree. I'd be super surprised if Kirby didn't hit the portal for a good, experienced QB. That's the way you win in the playoffs these days.

    Face it guys, Georgia may have plenty of denaros, but they also have a LOT more competition for the best players. It's a dog-eat-dog world of recruiting and transfers. We'll see how well Kirby's model is working after we get through another few seasons.

  • KaseyKasey Posts: 33,989 mod
    edited July 22

    why do people think we don’t have money? We are one of the biggest spenders out there. If Kirby sees a need for a transfer QB you can believe they will get the best. Already hearing the kid from Cal is a strong possibility.

  • MontanaDawgMontanaDawg Posts: 2,911 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @Kasey…the reason is that we don't have any high profile donors like Oregon and Texas Tech and a few other teams do. I also have read we don't spend quite as much as some programs. We're certainly not one of the very top spenders.

  • KaseyKasey Posts: 33,989 mod

    just because we don’t have a name donor doesn’t mean we have big money come in. We wouldn’t be successful in multiple sports if we didn’t.

    We don’t overspend on high school recruiting like the schools you mentioned. Most of the $ goes toward retention and portal guys. Tech spent $3M per year for Guyton. That’s absurd for a freshman who’s done nothing.

    Not sure where you’re reading we don’t spend as much but we are spending. Spell and Dollar in this class show that.

  • MontanaDawgMontanaDawg Posts: 2,911 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @Kasey…You can go to almost any site or use AI to summarize the top spending programs. I promise you none of them is Georgia. We spend a lot on football but not near as much as several programs. Whether or not that decision is random, due to a tight budget restrictions, or just Kirby's decision, I do not know.

    • Texas: Estimated roster valuations reach $47.9 million, fueled by a $23 million NIL transfer portal budget.
    • Miami: Valuations sit near $44 million with an estimated $16.5 million transfer portal budget.
    • Ohio State: Roster costs approach $43.5 million, with a reported $20 million allocated specifically for portal and NIL acquisitions.
    • LSU & Oregon: Both programs estimate around $42.8 million in total roster valuations, with Oregon maintaining a $19 million portal budget.
    • Texas A&M & Alabama: These SEC powerhouses hover between $37.2 million and $38.9 million in roster costs, consistently pulling in top-tier talent.

    I have read that Georgia roster value is around $35.5M. Notice that Indiana is not on this list, and they had no problem destroying their competitors last season and winning the Natty. So, coaching matters a LOT. Money doesn't always turn a good program great enough to win a NC.

  • UGADad20UGADad20 Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    I agree. UGA should be fine this season and will go as far as the QB takes the team. But the downturn in recruiting will have an impact in future seasons.

    Everyone including CKS alluded to the loses of Bobo and Harris as sinking the UGA season. In season's past UGA had quality depth to weather losing a 2nd team SEC OC and a good player at DE.

    It is too bad that UGA can't pay for elite players out of high school AND pay to retain them after UGA develops them. Apparently not enough money for that. OSU, TX, OR, AL and others seem to be able to fund that.

  • KaseyKasey Posts: 33,989 mod

    i wouldn’t trust AI to give accurate info on this as they are just scraping the internet filled with a bunch of people guessing how much guys are making. I wouldn’t call it reliable information considering there’s no public info behind any of that.

    And of all those teams you mentioned, none of them won much of anything outside of Ohio. And I still contend they won because they paid to bring all their older and experienced talent back along with some big ticket players like Downs and Judkins. Indiana won because they were well coached older players with a Heisman QB.


    some here think UGA doesn’t spend but I think that’s just not true. We can agree to disagree.

  • JimmiesNJoesJimmiesNJoes Posts: 53 ✭ Freshman
    edited July 22

    money isn’t the issue, more money is. Elite jimmies and joes cost more money, get used to 10th ranked recruiting classes from now on.

  • Draftpick01Draftpick01 Posts: 12 ✭✭ Sophomore

    Sorry money is a problem! How can you say the bulk was spent retaining players then that means less to acquire new players! Please stop with the cope! Georgia does not spend what the tops do, I would even say Georgia is probably 5-6 th just in the SEC alone! If money was not a problem we would not have had the 6th ranked class last year nor would they currently be ranked 12th!

  • WildmanSlayerWildmanSlayer Posts: 124 ✭✭✭ Junior

    Just because a team is paying more NIL money doesn’t mean they’re getting better results; they might just have more gaps to fill at certain positions, or they could be overpaying. Personally, I’d take less NIL and be developed by Kirby’s staff if I were a player, since his players have a track record of making it to the NFL.

Sign In or Register to comment.