Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
Comments
The 76 version is good with all the actual footage.
Good point
On that note, if you've never watched old footage of aircraft carrier landings (successful and not) on youtube, it's well worth the time. Pretty incredible stuff.
Just you. I dearly love that movie.
You just had to put the year of the movie! Now I really feel old!
"Pacific war turned in a manner of 5 min ...." Could make that argument, depending on if another US carrier was sunk, and how many Japanese carriers were sunk. It certainly would have lengthened the war by 1-2 years.
A great (IMO) What If is what if Japan had not attacked or in some fashion declared war on the US. Japan in effect lost the war as soon as the first bomb exploded on Hawaii. But at that time (from memory), it had occupied what is now Vietnam (French). Siam (Thailand) was technically independent but had occupation forces in country - a puppet and vassal of Japan. It occupied coastal and northern China and Manchuria (minerals), and I think had already occupied Korea. They lost all of this on surrender. Japan had not yet conquered the Dutch East Indies (oil), nor Malaysia (British) nor Burma (British).
The argument is that due to the US cutting off oil (in particular), and trade in raw minerals in protest of what Japan was doing in China, Japan was forced to attack the US. But the Dutch government was in exile in Britain, its country now occupied by Nazi Germany. I think that the Dutch government would have agreed to sell oil from its Indonesia colony (Dutch East Indies). Like Siam, Japan had a stranglehold on any trade that the Dutch could hope to engage in.
Japan could have caused the British fits in India via propaganda and independence talk, as it did to some extent anyway pushing a racial war type propaganda. It might have brought The Philippines into its orbit for similar reasons. It likely could not have invaded British territory without outright invading the Dutch East Indies. It would likely have done this at some point, but to throw the British and US off balance, it would have done better by waiting to do so.
Here's the big corollary. Hitler declared war on the US in Dec 1941 as a means to show goodwill to Japan in hopes (stupidly) that Japan would attack the USSR, forcing the latter into a two front conflict. Japan had already received a bloody nose in 1939? attacking the USSR at the Amur River area. For that reason, and others, Japan had no desire to have its own 2-3 front war (it never took China's efforts seriously but had the bulk of its army there). Hitler lost the war in effect when it declared war on the US.
So, when would Hitler have attacked the US? How would the UK and USSR have fared in the interim? My guess is that the USSR would have had a stalemate at best for an extended period and lost more territory and far more troops. The UK would likely have not been invaded but would have been barely hanging on. Churchill would have been hounded out of office, perhaps to be restored later when the US came into the conflict, if it did.
Anyone seen this yet? Am hoping it is less "Pearl Harbor" than I get the feeling it might be.
Pearl Harbor was the worst piece of cinematic garbage to ever grace the big screen....maybe tied w Armageddon.
I love good war movies & war history but the trailers for this look more like the next Star Wars. The last legit war movie I saw was Fury. Even though it starred the Bradiator, the supporting cast, story line & raw brutality made the top 10 in war movies for me.
I think I'll wait for this one to come out on HBO & save my actual trip to a theater for the next (last) Star Wars this Christmas.
I cheered when Josh Hartnett got shot at the end of Pearl Harbor
I cheered when Ben got his gf stolen then again when Josh got shot and yet again when the movie ended
Kate Beckinsale
Beginning and end of all the good things in Pearl Harbor. (And I don't mean her acting)
YEa God was showing off when he made her
I saw it. I enjoyed it for what it was, a Hollywood version of the war/battle. I wasn't, and still am not, familiar with the main actors/actresses (other than Dennis Quaid and **** H.), which is a plus. They didn't annoy me. I would say it is more like Unbreakable than Pearl Harbor in terms of the feel of the movie. Although it has been years since I've seen either.
I'm not a history buff so I don't know how it compares to historical "facts". I'm generally not overly critical of movies other than being easily annoyed by certain actors/actresses and overacting in general. So take the above for what it's worth.
I also saw the previous version which featured a very short-lived special theatre effect called SENSURROUND that used large speakers strategically placed around the cinema (other movies with it were Earthquake and RollerCoaster).
I remember one scene where a giant B-17 bomber landed on only one wheel. Just this year my family finally learned what happened to my father’s first cousin, who was KIA in 1943. He was copilot of a B-17 that was part of a massive raid on Stuttgart on Sept 3. Over France smoke was noticed trailing from the bomb bay, so his plane broke from the tight defensive formation to check it out. The plane then exploded killing 6, but amazingly 4 men survived and 2 evaded capture.
Remembering Flight Officer Harvey Protsman of Menden, Ohio.
The father of a buddy at UGA was a Pilot of a B-17 in WWII. He let me wear hid father's flight jacket on campus. He had a scrap book documenting each flight. Lots of flack. Said they use to wash tailgunner's remains out with a fire hose.
Shot down over France and helped by the Underground. Picture of the crew in front of their bird. Looked like kids.