Home Off Topic
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

Josh Donaldson

13

Comments

  • KirbstomperKirbstomper ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @WCDawg said:

    @kelly_b said:

    @Steve_Zissou said:
    Camargo is great- dude will take SS duties this year.
    Dansby still has a little trade value. I could see him moved b4 Spring.
    Not sure why ATL media has Markasis on trading block. We would be foolish to let him go. Solid .285 hitter every year

    I like Nick, too, but he played well above expectations last year. If they don't move him now (and let's face it, he's in the twilight of his career) they won't get max value for him, so it makes sense imo.

    Markakis had a good year, but it wasn't an anomaly, he's never had a really bad year in 13 MLB seasons.
    In 2018 his OBP was .366, his career average is .358.
    His BA in 2018 was .297, his career average is .288.
    He also played all 162 games in 2018. I think he'd be low risk over a 3 season contract.

    We have talked about this before, so you know I adamantly disagree. I say that he was horrible in 2016 and 2017 and is 35 years old. Don’t need to rehash all that though.

    I hope they go after a 3-4 win player with some years of control in that spot via trade. They’ve got plenty of prospects to swing some deals

  • WCDawgWCDawg ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @kelly_b said:

    @WCDawg said:

    @kelly_b said:

    @Steve_Zissou said:
    Camargo is great- dude will take SS duties this year.
    Dansby still has a little trade value. I could see him moved b4 Spring.
    Not sure why ATL media has Markasis on trading block. We would be foolish to let him go. Solid .285 hitter every year

    I like Nick, too, but he played well above expectations last year. If they don't move him now (and let's face it, he's in the twilight of his career) they won't get max value for him, so it makes sense imo.

    Markakis had a good year, but it wasn't an anomaly, he's never had a really bad year in 13 MLB seasons.
    In 2018 his OBP was .366, his career average is .358.
    His BA in 2018 was .297, his career average is .288.
    He also played all 162 games in 2018. I think he'd be low risk over a 3 season contract.

    No, you're right, but nobody really expected him to perform as well as he did. And he was great. Plus, I was under the misapprehension that we had him for another year, but as @TNDawg71 pointed out to me, he's a free agent. It all depends. Personally, I'd like to see them invest the lion's share of what's left to spend on the pen and maybe a front-end guy to fill the hole Teheran represents. As much as I like Julio, he's too unpredictable. I don't know. Do we have any prospects in the OF who could take Nick's place or do you think they should sign him?

    It depends on how management feels about options in RF if Nick isn't brought back. I'd hate to add offense in one spot just to lose it in another area. NM has a very solid built, no injury concerns and a very mechanically sound nd patient approach to hitting.

  • WCDawgWCDawg ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited November 2018

    @Kirbstomper said:

    @WCDawg said:

    @kelly_b said:

    @Steve_Zissou said:
    Camargo is great- dude will take SS duties this year.
    Dansby still has a little trade value. I could see him moved b4 Spring.
    Not sure why ATL media has Markasis on trading block. We would be foolish to let him go. Solid .285 hitter every year

    I like Nick, too, but he played well above expectations last year. If they don't move him now (and let's face it, he's in the twilight of his career) they won't get max value for him, so it makes sense imo.

    Markakis had a good year, but it wasn't an anomaly, he's never had a really bad year in 13 MLB seasons.
    In 2018 his OBP was .366, his career average is .358.
    His BA in 2018 was .297, his career average is .288.
    He also played all 162 games in 2018. I think he'd be low risk over a 3 season contract.

    We have talked about this before, so you know I adamantly disagree. I say that he was horrible in 2016 and 2017 and is 35 years old. Don’t need to rehash all that though.

    I hope they go after a 3-4 win player with some years of control in that spot via trade. They’ve got plenty of prospects to swing some deals

    Here is how I view it.
    In NM's 4 seasons as a Brave he's been 1st in MLB among RFs in doubles twice and 2nd the other 2 years. His OBP has averaged 6th among RFs, but since those top 5 spots have been divided among more than 5 players, he's likely around 3rd overall. He has averaged playing 148 games over the past 8 seasons and he's committed just 10 errors over those 1184 games. He gets on base, he hits doubles, he doesn't commit errors and he's on the field almost every game, that is good net value.

  • TNDawg71TNDawg71 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @WCDawg said:

    @kelly_b said:

    @WCDawg said:

    @kelly_b said:

    @Steve_Zissou said:
    Camargo is great- dude will take SS duties this year.
    Dansby still has a little trade value. I could see him moved b4 Spring.
    Not sure why ATL media has Markasis on trading block. We would be foolish to let him go. Solid .285 hitter every year

    I like Nick, too, but he played well above expectations last year. If they don't move him now (and let's face it, he's in the twilight of his career) they won't get max value for him, so it makes sense imo.

    Markakis had a good year, but it wasn't an anomaly, he's never had a really bad year in 13 MLB seasons.
    In 2018 his OBP was .366, his career average is .358.
    His BA in 2018 was .297, his career average is .288.
    He also played all 162 games in 2018. I think he'd be low risk over a 3 season contract.

    No, you're right, but nobody really expected him to perform as well as he did. And he was great. Plus, I was under the misapprehension that we had him for another year, but as @TNDawg71 pointed out to me, he's a free agent. It all depends. Personally, I'd like to see them invest the lion's share of what's left to spend on the pen and maybe a front-end guy to fill the hole Teheran represents. As much as I like Julio, he's too unpredictable. I don't know. Do we have any prospects in the OF who could take Nick's place or do you think they should sign him?

    It depends on how management feels about options in RF if Nick isn't brought back. I'd hate to add offense in one spot just to lose it in another area. NM has a very solid built, no injury concerns and a very mechanically sound nd patient approach to hitting.

    I'm good with bringing him back, but in needs to be a 1-2 year or an inexpensive deal. Age always wins out. If there is a younger/cheaper option I'd prefer that.

  • kelly_bkelly_b ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @TNDawg71 said:

    @WCDawg said:

    @kelly_b said:

    @WCDawg said:

    @kelly_b said:

    @Steve_Zissou said:
    Camargo is great- dude will take SS duties this year.
    Dansby still has a little trade value. I could see him moved b4 Spring.
    Not sure why ATL media has Markasis on trading block. We would be foolish to let him go. Solid .285 hitter every year

    I like Nick, too, but he played well above expectations last year. If they don't move him now (and let's face it, he's in the twilight of his career) they won't get max value for him, so it makes sense imo.

    Markakis had a good year, but it wasn't an anomaly, he's never had a really bad year in 13 MLB seasons.
    In 2018 his OBP was .366, his career average is .358.
    His BA in 2018 was .297, his career average is .288.
    He also played all 162 games in 2018. I think he'd be low risk over a 3 season contract.

    No, you're right, but nobody really expected him to perform as well as he did. And he was great. Plus, I was under the misapprehension that we had him for another year, but as @TNDawg71 pointed out to me, he's a free agent. It all depends. Personally, I'd like to see them invest the lion's share of what's left to spend on the pen and maybe a front-end guy to fill the hole Teheran represents. As much as I like Julio, he's too unpredictable. I don't know. Do we have any prospects in the OF who could take Nick's place or do you think they should sign him?

    It depends on how management feels about options in RF if Nick isn't brought back. I'd hate to add offense in one spot just to lose it in another area. NM has a very solid built, no injury concerns and a very mechanically sound nd patient approach to hitting.

    I'm good with bringing him back, but in needs to be a 1-2 year or an inexpensive deal. Age always wins out. If there is a younger/cheaper option I'd prefer that.

    That's the gamble. His age. When is that drop-off coming? @WCDawg put up solid stats and he's right. I certainly won't grumble if he returns. I really loved watching him play this last season, but I will understand if the Braves pass. I'd like to be the proverbial fly on the wall and hear those conversations.

  • WCDawgWCDawg ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @TNDawg71 said:

    @WCDawg said:

    @kelly_b said:

    @WCDawg said:

    @kelly_b said:

    @Steve_Zissou said:
    Camargo is great- dude will take SS duties this year.
    Dansby still has a little trade value. I could see him moved b4 Spring.
    Not sure why ATL media has Markasis on trading block. We would be foolish to let him go. Solid .285 hitter every year

    I like Nick, too, but he played well above expectations last year. If they don't move him now (and let's face it, he's in the twilight of his career) they won't get max value for him, so it makes sense imo.

    Markakis had a good year, but it wasn't an anomaly, he's never had a really bad year in 13 MLB seasons.
    In 2018 his OBP was .366, his career average is .358.
    His BA in 2018 was .297, his career average is .288.
    He also played all 162 games in 2018. I think he'd be low risk over a 3 season contract.

    No, you're right, but nobody really expected him to perform as well as he did. And he was great. Plus, I was under the misapprehension that we had him for another year, but as @TNDawg71 pointed out to me, he's a free agent. It all depends. Personally, I'd like to see them invest the lion's share of what's left to spend on the pen and maybe a front-end guy to fill the hole Teheran represents. As much as I like Julio, he's too unpredictable. I don't know. Do we have any prospects in the OF who could take Nick's place or do you think they should sign him?

    It depends on how management feels about options in RF if Nick isn't brought back. I'd hate to add offense in one spot just to lose it in another area. NM has a very solid built, no injury concerns and a very mechanically sound nd patient approach to hitting.

    I'm good with bringing him back, but in needs to be a 1-2 year or an inexpensive deal. Age always wins out. If there is a younger/cheaper option I'd prefer that.

    I'd prefer a 2 year deal, at the right price of course. My question is always, is he likely better than who we'd end up with if we go another way.

  • kelly_bkelly_b ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    I'd prefer a 2 year deal, at the right price of course. My question is always, is he likely better than who we'd end up with if we go another way.

    Yeah, I'm trying to think about who's out there but I haven't been keeping up on a daily basis like I will come spring training. So, I don't know who that candidate might be. I'm so consumed with UGA right now...which is cool because it's an ideal salve for the Falcons which makes me feel dreadful for even alluding to them.

  • PTDawgPTDawg ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    I'm concerned that 2018 may have been a bit of an anomaly for him at this point in his career. I don't have the stats in front of me but he was an all-star level performer the first 6-8 weeks. After that he was a replacement level player the rest of the way.

  • WCDawgWCDawg ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @kelly_b said:

    I'd prefer a 2 year deal, at the right price of course. My question is always, is he likely better than who we'd end up with if we go another way.

    Yeah, I'm trying to think about who's out there but I haven't been keeping up on a daily basis like I will come spring training. So, I don't know who that candidate might be. I'm so consumed with UGA right now...which is cool because it's an ideal salve for the Falcons which makes me feel dreadful for even alluding to them.

    Who are these Foul-cons you allude to ?
    I might do some quick research on potential free agent and trade bait RFs tonight.

  • KirbstomperKirbstomper ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @kelly_b said:

    I'd prefer a 2 year deal, at the right price of course. My question is always, is he likely better than who we'd end up with if we go another way.

    Yeah, I'm trying to think about who's out there but I haven't been keeping up on a daily basis like I will come spring training. So, I don't know who that candidate might be. I'm so consumed with UGA right now...which is cool because it's an ideal salve for the Falcons which makes me feel dreadful for even alluding to them.

    Brantley and pollack are two of the top free agents still out there that have upside. As usual both are on the tail end of their careers and have injury risks, but both have shown to be good players when healthy. They could also try and target someone else in a trade, though I haven’t heard any names associated with them.

    If they re sign Markakis it would probably be a stopgap for a year or just for outfield depth. Publicly available Projection systems estimate him to be about 1.1 WAR in 2019 which is below average to bad. Teams will have their own systems, but the projections will probably be pretty similar.

    And while Nick was pretty good in 2018 with 2.6 WAR, he was below average in 2016 at 1.2 WAR and bad in 2017, at 0.5 WAR despite decent surface level stats. If you buy into him replicating 2018 again he would be a pretty good option, but contending teams can’t afford to give consistent starts to 2017 Nick.

  • WCDawgWCDawg ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @Kirbstomper said:

    @kelly_b said:

    I'd prefer a 2 year deal, at the right price of course. My question is always, is he likely better than who we'd end up with if we go another way.

    Yeah, I'm trying to think about who's out there but I haven't been keeping up on a daily basis like I will come spring training. So, I don't know who that candidate might be. I'm so consumed with UGA right now...which is cool because it's an ideal salve for the Falcons which makes me feel dreadful for even alluding to them.

    Brantley and pollack are two of the top free agents still out there that have upside. As usual both are on the tail end of their careers and have injury risks, but both have shown to be good players when healthy. They could also try and target someone else in a trade, though I haven’t heard any names associated with them.

    If they re sign Markakis it would probably be a stopgap for a year or just for outfield depth. Publicly available Projection systems estimate him to be about 1.1 WAR in 2019 which is below average to bad. Teams will have their own systems, but the projections will probably be pretty similar.

    And while Nick was pretty good in 2018 with 2.6 WAR, he was below average in 2016 at 1.2 WAR and bad in 2017, at 0.5 WAR despite decent surface level stats. If you buy into him replicating 2018 again he would be a pretty good option, but contending teams can’t afford to give consistent starts to 2017 Nick.

    WAR is a useful tool sometimes, but I value OBP, doubles, durability and a lack of errors maybe more than whoever came up with that formula does. Markakis will likely give you 12 to 18 hr, 36 to 42 doubles, .350 to 370 OBP just 1 to 2 errors and 155 games per season.

  • TeddyTeddy ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @Kirbstomper said:

    @kelly_b said:

    I'd prefer a 2 year deal, at the right price of course. My question is always, is he likely better than who we'd end up with if we go another way.

    Yeah, I'm trying to think about who's out there but I haven't been keeping up on a daily basis like I will come spring training. So, I don't know who that candidate might be. I'm so consumed with UGA right now...which is cool because it's an ideal salve for the Falcons which makes me feel dreadful for even alluding to them.

    Brantley and pollack are two of the top free agents still out there that have upside. As usual both are on the tail end of their careers and have injury risks, but both have shown to be good players when healthy. They could also try and target someone else in a trade, though I haven’t heard any names associated with them.

    If they re sign Markakis it would probably be a stopgap for a year or just for outfield depth. Publicly available Projection systems estimate him to be about 1.1 WAR in 2019 which is below average to bad. Teams will have their own systems, but the projections will probably be pretty similar.

    And while Nick was pretty good in 2018 with 2.6 WAR, he was below average in 2016 at 1.2 WAR and bad in 2017, at 0.5 WAR despite decent surface level stats. If you buy into him replicating 2018 again he would be a pretty good option, but contending teams can’t afford to give consistent starts to 2017 Nick.

    Also, I'm sure Nick is looking for one last solid 3 or so year deal. Doubt he wants a 1 year deal, have a bad season, then all teams thinking father time has caught up with him. And that would ruin potential earnings until he retires. His stock is very unlikely to get any higher after last season, and at his age, so he should want to cash-in one last decent contract.

    I'm not against re-signing him, but for the right price... What does everyone think he's worth? And whatever you pay him that's less money to sure up the bullpen and front-line SP, so they'll likely have to trade away young players to get those issues solved.

  • kelly_bkelly_b ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Who are these Foul-cons you allude to ?
    I might do some quick research on potential free agent and trade bait RFs tonight.

    lol - The Falcons have been such a disappointment. I can't think of the last time I was so disappointed. The natty last year was disappointing but it was a weird disappointment. I guess because it's been so long since UGA was that close to a NC. I remember feeling this kind of disappointment when Garcia left Kimbrel in the pen in v LA. That kind of angry disappointment, haha.

  • WCDawgWCDawg ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @Teddy said:

    @Kirbstomper said:

    @kelly_b said:

    I'd prefer a 2 year deal, at the right price of course. My question is always, is he likely better than who we'd end up with if we go another way.

    Yeah, I'm trying to think about who's out there but I haven't been keeping up on a daily basis like I will come spring training. So, I don't know who that candidate might be. I'm so consumed with UGA right now...which is cool because it's an ideal salve for the Falcons which makes me feel dreadful for even alluding to them.

    Brantley and pollack are two of the top free agents still out there that have upside. As usual both are on the tail end of their careers and have injury risks, but both have shown to be good players when healthy. They could also try and target someone else in a trade, though I haven’t heard any names associated with them.

    If they re sign Markakis it would probably be a stopgap for a year or just for outfield depth. Publicly available Projection systems estimate him to be about 1.1 WAR in 2019 which is below average to bad. Teams will have their own systems, but the projections will probably be pretty similar.

    And while Nick was pretty good in 2018 with 2.6 WAR, he was below average in 2016 at 1.2 WAR and bad in 2017, at 0.5 WAR despite decent surface level stats. If you buy into him replicating 2018 again he would be a pretty good option, but contending teams can’t afford to give consistent starts to 2017 Nick.

    Also, I'm sure Nick is looking for one last solid 3 or so year deal. Doubt he wants a 1 year deal, have a bad season, then all teams thinking father time has caught up with him. And that would ruin potential earnings until he retires. His stock is very unlikely to get any higher after last season, and at his age, so he should want to cash-in one last decent contract.

    I'm not against re-signing him, but for the right price... What does everyone think he's worth? And whatever you pay him that's less money to sure up the bullpen and front-line SP, so they'll likely have to trade away young players to get those issues solved.

    I'd give him 2 years, I didn't see any signs of erosion in 2018.

  • KirbstomperKirbstomper ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @Teddy said:

    @Kirbstomper said:

    @kelly_b said:

    I'd prefer a 2 year deal, at the right price of course. My question is always, is he likely better than who we'd end up with if we go another way.

    Yeah, I'm trying to think about who's out there but I haven't been keeping up on a daily basis like I will come spring training. So, I don't know who that candidate might be. I'm so consumed with UGA right now...which is cool because it's an ideal salve for the Falcons which makes me feel dreadful for even alluding to them.

    Brantley and pollack are two of the top free agents still out there that have upside. As usual both are on the tail end of their careers and have injury risks, but both have shown to be good players when healthy. They could also try and target someone else in a trade, though I haven’t heard any names associated with them.

    If they re sign Markakis it would probably be a stopgap for a year or just for outfield depth. Publicly available Projection systems estimate him to be about 1.1 WAR in 2019 which is below average to bad. Teams will have their own systems, but the projections will probably be pretty similar.

    And while Nick was pretty good in 2018 with 2.6 WAR, he was below average in 2016 at 1.2 WAR and bad in 2017, at 0.5 WAR despite decent surface level stats. If you buy into him replicating 2018 again he would be a pretty good option, but contending teams can’t afford to give consistent starts to 2017 Nick.

    Also, I'm sure Nick is looking for one last solid 3 or so year deal. Doubt he wants a 1 year deal, have a bad season, then all teams thinking father time has caught up with him. And that would ruin potential earnings until he retires. His stock is very unlikely to get any higher after last season, and at his age, so he should want to cash-in one last decent contract.

    I'm not against re-signing him, but for the right price... What does everyone think he's worth? And whatever you pay him that's less money to sure up the bullpen and front-line SP, so they'll likely have to trade away young players to get those issues solved.

    Frankly nobody is going to give him a 3 year deal, so if we want him for 1 year we wouldn't be up against any big offers. Standard is usually players are worth 8.5-9M/WAR , but teams almost never pay that much. I feel like outfield role players could be> @Teddy said:

    @Kirbstomper said:

    @kelly_b said:

    I'd prefer a 2 year deal, at the right price of course. My question is always, is he likely better than who we'd end up with if we go another way.

    Yeah, I'm trying to think about who's out there but I haven't been keeping up on a daily basis like I will come spring training. So, I don't know who that candidate might be. I'm so consumed with UGA right now...which is cool because it's an ideal salve for the Falcons which makes me feel dreadful for even alluding to them.

    Brantley and pollack are two of the top free agents still out there that have upside. As usual both are on the tail end of their careers and have injury risks, but both have shown to be good players when healthy. They could also try and target someone else in a trade, though I haven’t heard any names associated with them.

    If they re sign Markakis it would probably be a stopgap for a year or just for outfield depth. Publicly available Projection systems estimate him to be about 1.1 WAR in 2019 which is below average to bad. Teams will have their own systems, but the projections will probably be pretty similar.

    And while Nick was pretty good in 2018 with 2.6 WAR, he was below average in 2016 at 1.2 WAR and bad in 2017, at 0.5 WAR despite decent surface level stats. If you buy into him replicating 2018 again he would be a pretty good option, but contending teams can’t afford to give consistent starts to 2017 Nick.

    Also, I'm sure Nick is looking for one last solid 3 or so year deal. Doubt he wants a 1 year deal, have a bad season, then all teams thinking father time has caught up with him. And that would ruin potential earnings until he retires. His stock is very unlikely to get any higher after last season, and at his age, so he should want to cash-in one last decent contract.

    I'm not against re-signing him, but for the right price... What does everyone think he's worth? And whatever you pay him that's less money to sure up the bullpen and front-line SP, so they'll likely have to trade away young players to get those issues solved.

    Frankly it isn't likely someone offers him a 3 year deal, because 35 year olds never get those. So we won't have to outbid those offers if we want him. I think he could be had for 6-8M but honestly I could be off, as I am not as well researched in salaries as I am about player value. An upper bound would be about 11M, anything after that and his contract would be bringing negative value to the team a la Tehran.

Sign In or Register to comment.