Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
Comments
What’s this word for me?
It starts with Disney
Your surrender is noted.
@swilkerson7317
I am quoting my own post from yesterday.....I ask again, does your opinion of the ajc piece change at all based on the fact presentation/non-editorialization piece written on the matter by Jake Rowe as published on DawgsHQ posted by @Kasey earlier in this thread?
Also, Have you actually READ the ajc piece!?
Again, just wondering.....!?
Who's to say that the Jarrett's are not seeking legal action against Judd and the AJC. It's still early.
What I want to know is why this 20 year old female wasn't charged with filing a false report.
For the rest of us out there who care about the truth, read for yourselves. Make up your own mind w serious this was. Be sure to read the whole thing, including follow up interviews. Nsfw.
I don’t think you understand how libel works. Jarrett would need to prove that the article ended up costing him money or a job, or in the immediate, his scholarship or an NIL deal. None of those things could be proved yEsTeRdAy. That still doesn’t change the fact the AJC is biased and editorializing.
Who's to say that the Jarrett's are not seeking legal action against Judd and the AJC. It's still early.
I'll hold my breath.
If the AJC wasn't reporting this stuff nobody would. Outlets like this one sure wouldn't.
Somebody has to ask the tough questions and hold people accountable. That is what a legit news organization does. They don't just do puff pieces over and over like say dawgnation. Which is not a news organization but a fan site. So that is really the purpose I get it.
I'm sorry you don't like it. Im sorry you don't think the obvious problems at UGA should be reported and swept under the rug. But we live in a free society and that means a free press that can ask tough questions.
Thank god for that. The alternative would be dark indeed.
IMHO it was more of a misunderstanding on her part. It wasn’t a false report more than reporting something that wasn’t actually a crime.
Investigator: “I had also reviewed and clarified the details of (her) own testimony with her to the point of confirming that she did not at any point articulate any crime being committed against her (she never directly told him to stop, took any action to try to top any given action, or articulated forced used.)”
Another thing bothering me about all of this, Jarrett was a minor at the time this happened. Why wasn't his name redacted like any other juvenile in most legal proceedings?
Wilk is back with his unsupported blanket statements—pretty much, as always, “My opinions (uninformed or otherwise) are truth! If you disagree with my opinions, you are a Disney Dawg and you are s.t.u.p.i.d!” 😬
Great question
Josh Pate's most recent commentary on the AJC article is spot on.
As long as the AJC believed what they were reporting was true at the time there is no issue anyway. They just got it wrong. Happens all the time.
What got Fox News in trouble is they knew what they were reporting was false but reported it anyway. Cost them about a billion dollars and several people their jobs. The AJC didn't do that.
at least he admits the AJC got it wrong. Where is the retraction?
I guess all this worked for Cox… first AJC article I have read in a long time. Apparently it is better to be known for poor journalism than to be unknown. 🤷🏻♂️
What’s the old addage? Hate is closer to love than indifference? 😬
You do seem to have a penchant for asking folks to prove a negative.