Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
Comments
Ahh, guess I saw 9 by Borodawg and misread. Well, I just gave you a tenth. For the record, I've upvoted a fair amount of your posts too. Your opinions are just divisive, and you seem to have a lot of "old man yells at cloud" kind of opinions.
Anyway, on another note, I didn't know you were a "high IQ" "good at Math" kind of guy! Maybe, you can help me. . .or maybe @levander can.
f: {1}-->{1}; f(x) = x^2
Do you know if this function can be increasing since its domain and codomain is just a single integer? If so, I would assume it's both injective and surjective, but I'm not positive. Do you know? This is a serious question, as I'm not getting the right answer, and I'm not completely sure why.
Not sure why you lumped me in with the genius who started this thread on that math question.
I looked at it, but only understand about half of the notation and vocabulary you’re using. So I have no idea, don’t remember enough of the math classes I took in college to know.
I looked once at the DV's I got and they fell into two categories: legit and hilarious. The legit ones had to do w/ my idea that maybe we should take a penalty of aggression on Tua in the SECCG early on. Not try to hurt him, but send a message. Got some DV's on that. Those were legit. I also came around. I believe it was @donm who changed my thinking on that one. The others were for statements so anodyne I just cracked up. I don't even recall who did them but it looked like a personal problem to me. I typically don't pay much attention to those things.
I think you will be disappointed because coach @nycdawg does believe ALL of it
I can't imagine going through and counting those votes
I do have a few people who downvote almost everything I say. They are the type of people who cannot compartmentalize.
I know a few people on here take their votes very seriously. One guy wrote a long paragraph to me about how much the votes mattered to him, how proud he was of his upvote to downvote ratio, and that people should put more thought into the votes they hand out.
I wish I still had the contact info for my college calculus professor Dr. Pal, he could help you.
"Have no fear, Dr. Pal is here"
or, else?
Or I'm going to buy him a drink to pour over his head
Now that's funny. It didn't take any time. 5-10 minutes maybe. The idea for the post came before the counting. It started with wondering how many times WC had downvoted me, because he is always trying to claim he is the victim. In doing that I noticed some of the same names over and over. We went to a black tie event on Saturday night with an open bar. I forget how many Woodford Reserves on the rocks I had, but I was feeling them lying on the couch Sunday morning so there literally wasn't much else for me to do. I do find it interesting that there really is a very small handful of people who dole out DVs. If you think about the number of people who frequent the board, and then look at how small the list of people who have DV just 5 times, and then from there to see that the number over 10 DVs is only 5 people among the thousands who view the board....well, draw your own conclusions.
What is more pathetic is the lack of UVs. Some put a lot into making a infotaining comment. And for that they may get ZERO UVs *. So, most of the mass that chooses not to vote at all, that is their decision - be lumps with no affect. For me, and other high character folks like me, I want commenters to know that their comments registered, for good or ill. But that is just me (and other HIGH character folks like me). /* But for me and other HIGH character folks like me. 😉
F(x) = x^2 is both increasing and decreasing.
Those were painful days for me. It's been a while, but I'm sure you know that assumptions don't mean anything in math. Test for one to one and then for onto. Then bijection is known rather than assumed.
"High character folks" I like it. I also respect your rationale.
That's all I've got. And I'm proud of that.
Very good @Bankwalker! Count me impressed. @JoelSidneyKelly, the part with the {1}’s at the start means that this function takes place on a single point. For the record, this function is indeed bijectice (invective and surjective), and it is also not only increasing and decreasing but also strictly increasing and strictly decreasing.
Also, just so we’re being comprehensive, and no one is being misled, if the function was f: R-->R;f(x) = x^2, R being all real numbers for the domain and codomain, then the graph would look like JSK’s, but the function would not be increasing, decreasing, injective, or surjective.