The Camp Fire is shaping up as our worst natural disaster since Katrina..

RxDawg · November 2018

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

It's the left's arrogance that makes them so dangerous. So easily willing to remove the rights of others in order to perpetuate their power grab. Eventually it will destroy America. It's sad not enough can see through their sham. All emotion, zero logic.

WCDawg · November 2018

@RxDawg said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

It's the left's arrogance that makes them so dangerous. So easily willing to remove the rights of others in order to perpetuate their power grab. Eventually it will destroy America. It's sad not enough can see through their sham. All emotion, zero logic.

The left my ass.
Many of the most prominent and vocal critics of trump's autocratic and devious tendencies are career intel leaders, and republicans to boot.
Trumpsters have nothing in common with real conservatives.at least not American conservatism, far right banana republic goons perhaps.

PerroGrande · November 2018

@WCDawg said:

@RxDawg said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

It's the left's arrogance that makes them so dangerous. So easily willing to remove the rights of others in order to perpetuate their power grab. Eventually it will destroy America. It's sad not enough can see through their sham. All emotion, zero logic.

The left my ass.
Many of the most prominent and vocal critics of trump's autocratic and devious tendencies are career intel leaders, and republicans to boot.
Trumpsters have nothing in common with real conservatives.at least not American conservatism, far right banana republic goons perhaps.

You just don’t get it. Most Reps didn’t vote for Trump because they love him. I’m not sure anybody outside of his family or the guy who sees him in the mirror loves him. They voted for him to avoid the dumpster fire offered by the other party. As bad as he is, he is still much better than the alternative. And yes, that is sad because the Dems have changed dramatically for the worse.

levander · November 2018

@WCDawg said:

@RxDawg said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

It's the left's arrogance that makes them so dangerous. So easily willing to remove the rights of others in order to perpetuate their power grab. Eventually it will destroy America. It's sad not enough can see through their sham. All emotion, zero logic.

The left my ass.
Many of the most prominent and vocal critics of trump's autocratic and devious tendencies are career intel leaders, and republicans to boot.
Trumpsters have nothing in common with real conservatives.at least not American conservatism, far right banana republic goons perhaps.

You live in a fascinating world WC. Always focusing on stuff like who the most prominent and vocal critics are...

Well, fascinating for someone who studies psychiatry. To the average Joe, not so much.

levander · November 2018

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

LOL @ personal enemies. He beat Hillary and she looks like a fool now. Trump probably considers her his best friend. Any time he wants to deflect media from something, he can pop off about Hillary...

But look WC. If you gonna be a fan of the Trump alarmist genre of reality television and all be trying to spread the message, your messages about Trump should probably actually be alarming.

Anybody can try to get somebody investigated. I can try to get somebody investigated. If Trump thinks someone should be investigating, he should try to get them investigated.

But here’s the rub, where your example actually proves Trump is not overstepping his constitutional powers. Did you notice that Hillary and Comey are actually not being investigated? Last we’ve heard public comment about it, Trump was criticizing Sessions for not investigating them.

So you’re running around screaming about Trump violating the constitution. And anyone who can think for half a second for himself will realize what you’re actually running around acting like a jackass about is proof Trump is following the constitution.

Did you study constitutional law in Russia ? You really are clueless.

Yeah, I travelled to Moscow and St Petersburg to study stuff like the Magna Carte, Montesquieu... They have good professors over there. Good one WC!

Yes, Trump is very wise to revere and invest in Putin, there is much to learn from KGB philosophy.

Do you understand that these “personal enemies” of Trump’s who’s privacy you are so concerned about making sure are offered the constitutional protections we all have the right to.... Do you understand these people are not being investigated?

There is no consistutional crisis. There is not even an investigation.

Do you understand that?

levander · November 2018

@YaleDawg said:

@levander said:

@YaleDawg said:

@levander said:
@YaleDawg Nobody cares that you didn’t go to Yale, bro. But it’s a bad look for us to have you running around acting like you did, when you didn’t...

Are you ok? It's a serious question. You seem distraught

No, I’m felling fine. I’m just trying to let you know you can drop the Yale act. Nobody cares you didn’t go there. There board isn’t a brainiac competition to see who the smartest is. The only loose requirement is that you be a Dawg fan.

@WCDawg - be honest. Yale is a tough school to get into. Does “YaleDawg” seem in any way shape or form bright enough to have gotten into Yale?

You are beyond childish

The quicker you give up the Yale shtick the better you’ll look. If you drag it out you’re gonna look silly after awhile.

WCDawg · November 2018

@PerroGrande said:

@WCDawg said:

@RxDawg said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

It's the left's arrogance that makes them so dangerous. So easily willing to remove the rights of others in order to perpetuate their power grab. Eventually it will destroy America. It's sad not enough can see through their sham. All emotion, zero logic.

The left my ass.
Many of the most prominent and vocal critics of trump's autocratic and devious tendencies are career intel leaders, and republicans to boot.
Trumpsters have nothing in common with real conservatives.at least not American conservatism, far right banana republic goons perhaps.

You just don’t get it. Most Reps didn’t vote for Trump because they love him. I’m not sure anybody outside of his family or the guy who sees him in the mirror loves him. They voted for him to avoid the dumpster fire offered by the other party. As bad as he is, he is still much better than the alternative. And yes, that is sad because the Dems have changed dramatically for the worse.

Then why do you constantly defend Trump ? you make no sense. I have more in common with Ike, Reagan and McCain than Trump does. I bet you were more than willing to trash John McCain when Trump did so, there is nothing worth a dam about Trumpsters.

levander · November 2018

@WCDawg said:

@PerroGrande said:

@WCDawg said:

@RxDawg said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

It's the left's arrogance that makes them so dangerous. So easily willing to remove the rights of others in order to perpetuate their power grab. Eventually it will destroy America. It's sad not enough can see through their sham. All emotion, zero logic.

The left my ass.
Many of the most prominent and vocal critics of trump's autocratic and devious tendencies are career intel leaders, and republicans to boot.
Trumpsters have nothing in common with real conservatives.at least not American conservatism, far right banana republic goons perhaps.

You just don’t get it. Most Reps didn’t vote for Trump because they love him. I’m not sure anybody outside of his family or the guy who sees him in the mirror loves him. They voted for him to avoid the dumpster fire offered by the other party. As bad as he is, he is still much better than the alternative. And yes, that is sad because the Dems have changed dramatically for the worse.

Then why do you constantly defend Trump ? you make no sense. I have more in common with Ike, Reagan and McCain than Trump does. I bet you were more than willing to trash John McCain when Trump did so, there is nothing worth a dam about Trumpsters.

People constantly defend Trump talking to you because you make all these silly ridiculous claims about Trump. Talking to reasonable people about Trump, reasonable people basically just discuss his pluses and minuses.

WCDawg · November 2018

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@PerroGrande said:

@WCDawg said:

@RxDawg said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

It's the left's arrogance that makes them so dangerous. So easily willing to remove the rights of others in order to perpetuate their power grab. Eventually it will destroy America. It's sad not enough can see through their sham. All emotion, zero logic.

The left my ass.
Many of the most prominent and vocal critics of trump's autocratic and devious tendencies are career intel leaders, and republicans to boot.
Trumpsters have nothing in common with real conservatives.at least not American conservatism, far right banana republic goons perhaps.

You just don’t get it. Most Reps didn’t vote for Trump because they love him. I’m not sure anybody outside of his family or the guy who sees him in the mirror loves him. They voted for him to avoid the dumpster fire offered by the other party. As bad as he is, he is still much better than the alternative. And yes, that is sad because the Dems have changed dramatically for the worse.

Then why do you constantly defend Trump ? you make no sense. I have more in common with Ike, Reagan and McCain than Trump does. I bet you were more than willing to trash John McCain when Trump did so, there is nothing worth a dam about Trumpsters.

People constantly defend Trump talking to you because you make all these silly ridiculous claims about Trump. Talking to reasonable people about Trump, reasonable people basically just discuss his pluses and minuses.

BS. you're obviously a dyed in the wool Trumpster.
I've never made a single claim about your hero that isn't apparent to people who care about what this country stands for and haven't sold out, his own words and actions make it obvious his tendencies are unAmerican.

PerroGrande · November 2018

@WCDawg said:

@PerroGrande said:

@WCDawg said:

@RxDawg said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

It's the left's arrogance that makes them so dangerous. So easily willing to remove the rights of others in order to perpetuate their power grab. Eventually it will destroy America. It's sad not enough can see through their sham. All emotion, zero logic.

The left my ass.
Many of the most prominent and vocal critics of trump's autocratic and devious tendencies are career intel leaders, and republicans to boot.
Trumpsters have nothing in common with real conservatives.at least not American conservatism, far right banana republic goons perhaps.

You just don’t get it. Most Reps didn’t vote for Trump because they love him. I’m not sure anybody outside of his family or the guy who sees him in the mirror loves him. They voted for him to avoid the dumpster fire offered by the other party. As bad as he is, he is still much better than the alternative. And yes, that is sad because the Dems have changed dramatically for the worse.

Then why do you constantly defend Trump ? you make no sense. I have more in common with Ike, Reagan and McCain than Trump does. I bet you were more than willing to trash John McCain when Trump did so, there is nothing worth a dam about Trumpsters.

Show me where I defended Trump and I’ll tell you why I said it. I think you are arguing with your own suppositions here, not against what was actually written.

WCDawg · November 2018

@PerroGrande said:

@WCDawg said:

@PerroGrande said:

@WCDawg said:

@RxDawg said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

It's the left's arrogance that makes them so dangerous. So easily willing to remove the rights of others in order to perpetuate their power grab. Eventually it will destroy America. It's sad not enough can see through their sham. All emotion, zero logic.

The left my ass.
Many of the most prominent and vocal critics of trump's autocratic and devious tendencies are career intel leaders, and republicans to boot.
Trumpsters have nothing in common with real conservatives.at least not American conservatism, far right banana republic goons perhaps.

You just don’t get it. Most Reps didn’t vote for Trump because they love him. I’m not sure anybody outside of his family or the guy who sees him in the mirror loves him. They voted for him to avoid the dumpster fire offered by the other party. As bad as he is, he is still much better than the alternative. And yes, that is sad because the Dems have changed dramatically for the worse.

Then why do you constantly defend Trump ? you make no sense. I have more in common with Ike, Reagan and McCain than Trump does. I bet you were more than willing to trash John McCain when Trump did so, there is nothing worth a dam about Trumpsters.

Show me where I defended Trump and I’ll tell you why I said it. I think you are arguing with your own suppositions here, not against what was actually written.

Since I wasn't responding to you it's a false flag you're waving.
If you're asking me to pour over old posts, I'll pass.

PerroGrande · November 2018

@WCDawg said:

@PerroGrande said:

@WCDawg said:

@PerroGrande said:

@WCDawg said:

@RxDawg said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

It's the left's arrogance that makes them so dangerous. So easily willing to remove the rights of others in order to perpetuate their power grab. Eventually it will destroy America. It's sad not enough can see through their sham. All emotion, zero logic.

The left my ass.
Many of the most prominent and vocal critics of trump's autocratic and devious tendencies are career intel leaders, and republicans to boot.
Trumpsters have nothing in common with real conservatives.at least not American conservatism, far right banana republic goons perhaps.

You just don’t get it. Most Reps didn’t vote for Trump because they love him. I’m not sure anybody outside of his family or the guy who sees him in the mirror loves him. They voted for him to avoid the dumpster fire offered by the other party. As bad as he is, he is still much better than the alternative. And yes, that is sad because the Dems have changed dramatically for the worse.

Then why do you constantly defend Trump ? you make no sense. I have more in common with Ike, Reagan and McCain than Trump does. I bet you were more than willing to trash John McCain when Trump did so, there is nothing worth a dam about Trumpsters.

Show me where I defended Trump and I’ll tell you why I said it. I think you are arguing with your own suppositions here, not against what was actually written.

Since I wasn't responding to you it's a false flag you're waving.
If you're asking me to pour over old posts, I'll pass.

Are you saying someone hacked your account and typed to me, “Then why do you constantly defend Trump?” WC, you don’t even know what you have written in the last hour!

WCDawg · November 2018

@PerroGrande said:

@WCDawg said:

@PerroGrande said:

@WCDawg said:

@PerroGrande said:

@WCDawg said:

@RxDawg said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

It's the left's arrogance that makes them so dangerous. So easily willing to remove the rights of others in order to perpetuate their power grab. Eventually it will destroy America. It's sad not enough can see through their sham. All emotion, zero logic.

The left my ass.
Many of the most prominent and vocal critics of trump's autocratic and devious tendencies are career intel leaders, and republicans to boot.
Trumpsters have nothing in common with real conservatives.at least not American conservatism, far right banana republic goons perhaps.

You just don’t get it. Most Reps didn’t vote for Trump because they love him. I’m not sure anybody outside of his family or the guy who sees him in the mirror loves him. They voted for him to avoid the dumpster fire offered by the other party. As bad as he is, he is still much better than the alternative. And yes, that is sad because the Dems have changed dramatically for the worse.

Then why do you constantly defend Trump ? you make no sense. I have more in common with Ike, Reagan and McCain than Trump does. I bet you were more than willing to trash John McCain when Trump did so, there is nothing worth a dam about Trumpsters.

Show me where I defended Trump and I’ll tell you why I said it. I think you are arguing with your own suppositions here, not against what was actually written.

Since I wasn't responding to you it's a false flag you're waving.
If you're asking me to pour over old posts, I'll pass.

Are you saying someone hacked your account and typed to me, “Then why do you constantly defend Trump?” WC, you don’t even know what you have written in the last hour!

Sorry, I didn't notice it was you, every other response was from levander.

RxDawg · November 2018

@WCDawg said:

@PerroGrande said:

@WCDawg said:

@RxDawg said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

It's the left's arrogance that makes them so dangerous. So easily willing to remove the rights of others in order to perpetuate their power grab. Eventually it will destroy America. It's sad not enough can see through their sham. All emotion, zero logic.

The left my ass.
Many of the most prominent and vocal critics of trump's autocratic and devious tendencies are career intel leaders, and republicans to boot.
Trumpsters have nothing in common with real conservatives.at least not American conservatism, far right banana republic goons perhaps.

You just don’t get it. Most Reps didn’t vote for Trump because they love him. I’m not sure anybody outside of his family or the guy who sees him in the mirror loves him. They voted for him to avoid the dumpster fire offered by the other party. As bad as he is, he is still much better than the alternative. And yes, that is sad because the Dems have changed dramatically for the worse.

Then why do you constantly defend Trump ? you make no sense. I have more in common with Ike, Reagan and McCain than Trump does. I bet you were more than willing to trash John McCain when Trump did so, there is nothing worth a dam about Trumpsters.

Because he's actually not that bad. The amount of power and money that has gone into just nothing but undermining and smearing him is unprecedented. That kind of effort could make anyone on this board look like a human rights monstrosity. For anyone with critical thinking, we can recognize the hyperbole. I was extremely skeptical of Trump at first, I doubted his motives. But now? He's convinced me he actually has the countries best interests at heart. There is simply no reason to go through what he is going through if you don't have to.

Simply put, in 2016 I was grateful that Hillary lost. In 2020 I'll be grateful that Trump wins.

WCDawg · November 2018

@RxDawg said:

@WCDawg said:

@PerroGrande said:

@WCDawg said:

@RxDawg said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

It's the left's arrogance that makes them so dangerous. So easily willing to remove the rights of others in order to perpetuate their power grab. Eventually it will destroy America. It's sad not enough can see through their sham. All emotion, zero logic.

The left my ass.
Many of the most prominent and vocal critics of trump's autocratic and devious tendencies are career intel leaders, and republicans to boot.
Trumpsters have nothing in common with real conservatives.at least not American conservatism, far right banana republic goons perhaps.

You just don’t get it. Most Reps didn’t vote for Trump because they love him. I’m not sure anybody outside of his family or the guy who sees him in the mirror loves him. They voted for him to avoid the dumpster fire offered by the other party. As bad as he is, he is still much better than the alternative. And yes, that is sad because the Dems have changed dramatically for the worse.

Then why do you constantly defend Trump ? you make no sense. I have more in common with Ike, Reagan and McCain than Trump does. I bet you were more than willing to trash John McCain when Trump did so, there is nothing worth a dam about Trumpsters.

Because he's actually not that bad. The amount of power and money that has gone into just nothing but undermining and smearing him is unprecedented. That kind of effort could make anyone on this board look like a human rights monstrosity. For anyone with critical thinking, we can recognize the hyperbole. I was extremely skeptical of Trump at first, I doubted his motives. But now? He's convinced me he actually has the countries best interests at heart. There is simply no reason to go through what he is going through if you don't have to.

Simply put, in 2016 I was grateful that Hillary lost. In 2020 I'll be grateful that Trump wins.

Trump is a wannabe dictator, thank God there are still a few republicans willing to resist.
The number of times those surrounding Trump have kept him from violating constitutional law is staggering.

The Camp Fire is shaping up as our worst natural disaster since Katrina..

Comments