The Camp Fire is shaping up as our worst natural disaster since Katrina..

WCDawg

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

levander

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

WCDawg

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

levander

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

levander

@YaleDawg Nobody cares that you didn’t go to Yale, bro. But it’s a bad look for us to have you running around acting like you did, when you didn’t...

YaleDawg

@levander said:
@YaleDawg Nobody cares that you didn’t go to Yale, bro. But it’s a bad look for us to have you running around acting like you did, when you didn’t...

Are you ok? It's a serious question. You seem distraught

WCDawg

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

levander

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

LOL @ personal enemies. He beat Hillary and she looks like a fool now. Trump probably considers her his best friend. Any time he wants to deflect media from something, he can pop off about Hillary...

But look WC. If you gonna be a fan of the Trump alarmist genre of reality television and all be trying to spread the message, your messages about Trump should probably actually be alarming.

Anybody can try to get somebody investigated. I can try to get somebody investigated. If Trump thinks someone should be investigating, he should try to get them investigated.

But here’s the rub, where your example actually proves Trump is not overstepping his constitutional powers. Did you notice that Hillary and Comey are actually not being investigated? Last we’ve heard public comment about it, Trump was criticizing Sessions for not investigating them.

So you’re running around screaming about Trump violating the constitution. And anyone who can think for half a second for himself will realize what you’re actually running around acting like a jackass about is proof Trump is following the constitution.

levander

@YaleDawg said:

@levander said:
@YaleDawg Nobody cares that you didn’t go to Yale, bro. But it’s a bad look for us to have you running around acting like you did, when you didn’t...

Are you ok? It's a serious question. You seem distraught

No, I’m felling fine. I’m just trying to let you know you can drop the Yale act. Nobody cares you didn’t go there. There board isn’t a brainiac competition to see who the smartest is. The only loose requirement is that you be a Dawg fan.

@WCDawg - be honest. Yale is a tough school to get into. Does “YaleDawg” seem in any way shape or form bright enough to have gotten into Yale?

WCDawg

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

LOL @ personal enemies. He beat Hillary and she looks like a fool now. Trump probably considers her his best friend. Any time he wants to deflect media from something, he can pop off about Hillary...

But look WC. If you gonna be a fan of the Trump alarmist genre of reality television and all be trying to spread the message, your messages about Trump should probably actually be alarming.

Anybody can try to get somebody investigated. I can try to get somebody investigated. If Trump thinks someone should be investigating, he should try to get them investigated.

But here’s the rub, where your example actually proves Trump is not overstepping his constitutional powers. Did you notice that Hillary and Comey are actually not being investigated? Last we’ve heard public comment about it, Trump was criticizing Sessions for not investigating them.

So you’re running around screaming about Trump violating the constitution. And anyone who can think for half a second for himself will realize what you’re actually running around acting like a jackass about is proof Trump is following the constitution.

Did you study constitutional law in Russia ? You really are clueless.

levander

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

LOL @ personal enemies. He beat Hillary and she looks like a fool now. Trump probably considers her his best friend. Any time he wants to deflect media from something, he can pop off about Hillary...

But look WC. If you gonna be a fan of the Trump alarmist genre of reality television and all be trying to spread the message, your messages about Trump should probably actually be alarming.

Anybody can try to get somebody investigated. I can try to get somebody investigated. If Trump thinks someone should be investigating, he should try to get them investigated.

But here’s the rub, where your example actually proves Trump is not overstepping his constitutional powers. Did you notice that Hillary and Comey are actually not being investigated? Last we’ve heard public comment about it, Trump was criticizing Sessions for not investigating them.

So you’re running around screaming about Trump violating the constitution. And anyone who can think for half a second for himself will realize what you’re actually running around acting like a jackass about is proof Trump is following the constitution.

Did you study constitutional law in Russia ? You really are clueless.

Yeah, I travelled to Moscow and St Petersburg to study stuff like the Magna Carte, Montesquieu... They have good professors over there. Good one WC!

WCDawg

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:

@levander said:

@12ed said:

@levander said:

@WCDawg said:
Trump's heartwarming message to troops during the traditional Thanksgiving call to our service members. ''They are amassing on our border, they are not good people, they are bad people'' I'm reminded of Trump's speech at a Boy Scout convention where he told them how great he is and how unfair people are to him....me.me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me,me...what a guy !

What’s **** up about this thread is I can’t tell whose posts are goofier, 12ed or WCDawg’s.

Lavendar I take exception to this. I've been 100% serious all the time just like I always am. WC has too. I took exception to knocks on CT, the pubic hair on a coke can BS was very much like the Kavanaugh BS. Don't @ me. Not in the mood for putting up with political sophistry today

Okay, so I make the mistake of reading your bickering it’s WC, and apparently Ihave been able to figure it out. WCDawg is goofier than 12ed.

Basically, if you start with whatever thing would make the Democrat party look better in the public eye, then work backwards towards beliefs, you end up with what WCDawg believes. Hopefully he has at least one or two things up him sleeve and be like, “See! I’m not complete a mind **** to the Democrat party corporation!”

You on the other hand will sit there and argue endlessly pointing out flaws in what the person you are talking to believes. Probably why you are making a big deal about a Avenatti/Beto ticket, because you know that’s what most people will disagree with. People probably don’t want to realize if they could catch a few breaks in the media, that ticket could actually be interesting.

Still goofy as hell. Just not as goofy as WC.

You're as honest as a water diviner and as smart as a sack of hammers.

Why, because what I have to say doesn’t benefit the Democrat party public image?

No, because you're wrong and sort of lame.

Says the guy who considers Hillary and Comey investigations subversive and detrimental to our constitution. But when you investigate someone based on a ridiculous foreign written dossier the investigators knew to be fraudulent, then you have an important case NEEDING investigating.

How did you arrive at those conclusions?

If you had a clue what country you live in you'd understand it isn't The POTUS who gets to decide who is prosecuted. Asking for somebody Trump sees as a personal enemy to be prosecuted is indeed subversive to The Constitution of The United States.
Seriously, people like you shouldn't vote.

LOL @ personal enemies. He beat Hillary and she looks like a fool now. Trump probably considers her his best friend. Any time he wants to deflect media from something, he can pop off about Hillary...

But look WC. If you gonna be a fan of the Trump alarmist genre of reality television and all be trying to spread the message, your messages about Trump should probably actually be alarming.

Anybody can try to get somebody investigated. I can try to get somebody investigated. If Trump thinks someone should be investigating, he should try to get them investigated.

But here’s the rub, where your example actually proves Trump is not overstepping his constitutional powers. Did you notice that Hillary and Comey are actually not being investigated? Last we’ve heard public comment about it, Trump was criticizing Sessions for not investigating them.

So you’re running around screaming about Trump violating the constitution. And anyone who can think for half a second for himself will realize what you’re actually running around acting like a jackass about is proof Trump is following the constitution.

Did you study constitutional law in Russia ? You really are clueless.

Yeah, I travelled to Moscow and St Petersburg to study stuff like the Magna Carte, Montesquieu... They have good professors over there. Good one WC!

Yes, Trump is very wise to revere and invest in Putin, there is much to learn from KGB philosophy.

YaleDawg

@levander said:

@YaleDawg said:

@levander said:
@YaleDawg Nobody cares that you didn’t go to Yale, bro. But it’s a bad look for us to have you running around acting like you did, when you didn’t...

Are you ok? It's a serious question. You seem distraught

No, I’m felling fine. I’m just trying to let you know you can drop the Yale act. Nobody cares you didn’t go there. There board isn’t a brainiac competition to see who the smartest is. The only loose requirement is that you be a Dawg fan.

@WCDawg - be honest. Yale is a tough school to get into. Does “YaleDawg” seem in any way shape or form bright enough to have gotten into Yale?

You are beyond childish

donm

@YaleDawg said:

@levander said:

@YaleDawg said:

@levander said:
@YaleDawg Nobody cares that you didn’t go to Yale, bro. But it’s a bad look for us to have you running around acting like you did, when you didn’t...

Are you ok? It's a serious question. You seem distraught

No, I’m felling fine. I’m just trying to let you know you can drop the Yale act. Nobody cares you didn’t go there. There board isn’t a brainiac competition to see who the smartest is. The only loose requirement is that you be a Dawg fan.

@WCDawg - be honest. Yale is a tough school to get into. Does “YaleDawg” seem in any way shape or form bright enough to have gotten into Yale?

You are beyond childish

Hmm. What's beyond childlish? Maturity? Or going in the other direction, nothingness? Interesting thought experiment. Yes, I'm busy waiting for the weekend to arrive too. too much free time so I turn to thought experiments.

WCDawg

@donm said:

@YaleDawg said:

@levander said:

@YaleDawg said:

@levander said:
@YaleDawg Nobody cares that you didn’t go to Yale, bro. But it’s a bad look for us to have you running around acting like you did, when you didn’t...

Are you ok? It's a serious question. You seem distraught

No, I’m felling fine. I’m just trying to let you know you can drop the Yale act. Nobody cares you didn’t go there. There board isn’t a brainiac competition to see who the smartest is. The only loose requirement is that you be a Dawg fan.

@WCDawg - be honest. Yale is a tough school to get into. Does “YaleDawg” seem in any way shape or form bright enough to have gotten into Yale?

You are beyond childish

Hmm. What's beyond childlish? Maturity? Or going in the other direction, nothingness? Interesting thought experiment. Yes, I'm busy waiting for the weekend to arrive too. too much free time so I turn to thought experiments.

Infantile seems the most logical progression, or digression.