Home The G.O.A.T.s: Forum Thread Hall of Fame
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

Next To Commit To The G 2020

152535557581668

Comments

  • Midnite_TrainMidnite_Train Posts: 862 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    From some words within this thread, the academics angle is probably more of a ruse as to why the instate school is not the favorite.

    Sucks to see an elite defensive lineman opt elsewhere year after year. Hopefully Travon Walker balls out to create some momentum and change some opinions

  • Acrum21Acrum21 Posts: 2,439 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @Thelordjohnson Yes they do. Nakobe took his 4.3 GPA to that engineering program at UGA... so I agree with @Midnite_Train about the ruse with the academic angle.

  • YaleDawgYaleDawg Posts: 7,269 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    UGA is the #13 public university, Clemson is #24, and awburn is #115 for overall rankings. For engineering it gets flipped, awburn and Clemson are top 60 and UGA is 116. It's going to be hard to pull top level players that are serious about engineering and football away from clemson

  • FirePlugDawgFirePlugDawg Posts: 5,480 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
  • bigdawg2223bigdawg2223 Posts: 1,833 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    The poster I replied to was very vague and yes this year we’re looking good with in-state kids. But the way it was said “we don’t need in-state kids we’re a national brand” like, that’s foolish. What about the next 2018? Building those relationships is key in recruiting it’s been proven. So, yes we’re doing good with the in-state kids but that doesn’t mean we should abandon them in the years to come because there’s a shiney new 5 star in Washington that we can pull in who hasn't played the competition that’s in the state of Georgia.


    Disclaimer that’s not a knock on Eason just the closest comparison I could think of.

  • MIghtydawgMIghtydawg Posts: 984 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    That was my post. You missed the sarcasm font. I have gone round and round with the number of posters on here about the importance of in-state recruiting. There are several posters on here, including Jeff sentell, who believe that because Georgia has a national brand that instate recruiting is not as important.

  • ThelordjohnsonThelordjohnson Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @Acrum21 @YaleDawg @FirePlugDawg

    The engineering program at UGA what all focuses does it have? I know structural engineering is his main goal. (GT is ranked 3rd).

  • Acrum21Acrum21 Posts: 2,439 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Don't see any structural engineering.

  • AnotherDawgAnotherDawg Posts: 6,762 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    If you want to be an engineer, go to Tech. If you want to play football, Georgia and Clemson are both good choices. But don't tell me it's about engineering.

  • bigdawg2223bigdawg2223 Posts: 1,833 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @MIghtydawg I retract my previous comment then. My apologies for missing the sarcasm.

This discussion has been closed.