Home General
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

Leadership and Lack of It

2»

Comments

  • Casanova_FlatulenceCasanova_Flatulence ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    You can be a bad person and still be a good leader for a period of time. There are tons of examples throughout history of people having bizarre, self-destructive or deviant behaviors in their private lives, but were able to motivate and lead people to a common purpose or objective. JFK is a prime example. If you know anything about his personal life then you know he was a sexual predator and deviant who cheated on his wife regularly. Same could said about Bill Clinton.

    My former next door neighbor was Uncle and guardian to the Burton brothers, both played for Meyers. From the many stories he's told me about Urban, that man could command a room like like nobody's business. His track record of success speaks to his leadership skills. That said, he's not someone I respect.

  • Same could also be said about Nixon (morals) and Trump (sexual predator) so that goes both ways.

    I have no doubt Urban commands a room. But for me character counts

  • BankwalkerBankwalker ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    The premise for the entire thread was silly, but the stuff you list about Mark Richt makes you sound like a Ga Tech fan. “Off the Field” troubles? There were a slew of driving without a license arrests but no major issues of violence toward women, armed robbery, or other felonies. Mediocre assistant hires? Such as? Okay Schottenheimer. He’s not a mediocre football coach. He just didn’t fit the college game but grabbing an OC from the NFL would have been celebrated by you bunch of urnge tards in a big way until it didn’t work out. One year isn’t a sample size to judge.

    As for graduation success rates, the program was performing lackluster under Jim Donnan. 2007 was the first year (cohort class of 2001) that was actually under Mark Richt’s full guidance. The rate was just below 50% and increased every year. The 2006 class graduation rate was 82%, which was for the year 2012 (higher than Clemson, btw). That was also tops in the SEC.

    That number has fallen a bit, but even you should be able to comprehend that comes with the territory when a new coach is hired ; transfers, etc. Clemson has a nice graduation rate over the last 5-7 years but prior to that you guys were below the national avg in the 60 percent range - and not sniffing the Top 10 on the field the way Richt was doing.

Sign In or Register to comment.