Home The G.O.A.T.s: Forum Thread Hall of Fame
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

Next To Commit To The G 2020

13753763783803811251

Comments

  • fibonaccisquaredfibonaccisquared Posts: 43 ✭✭✭ Junior

    I can't imagine we would just due to how tight space is in the class already. We may put a little more emphasis on finding PWO RBs for this cycle though for that reason. 5 RBs is still a lot... even with the amount that we spread the ball around.

  • BaxleydawgBaxleydawg Posts: 4,841 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @CZCashvilleDawg I agree DW goes to Alabama. I think James Coley and Todd Hartley will impress TJ and AG by the end of the Notre Dame game. Kirby maybe the best recruiter in the game. The reason I’m not work about Mullet. Kirby has earned our trust. Pruitt can recruit though. More worried about Tennesse than Florida next 5 years

  • Denmen185Denmen185 Posts: 7,446 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    5 RB is the ideal number. A 3rd RB would be a gross waste of scholarship and I would rather take a 5th WR to cover an area where we are short both in terms of overall numbers and Blue Chip recruits. A running attack is obviously our preference but will not be successful without a credible passing threat.

  • gdawg4lifegdawg4life Posts: 799 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Is this a rule change in the last 15 years or so? I recall seeing a documentary on the Miami Hurricanes and they were limited on football scholarships, so they got creative and brought a few guys in on track scholarships. They ran track and I believe we’re cons “walk-ons” for the football team. Again, this was more than a decade ago so rules could have changed.

  • Ugadawg1993Ugadawg1993 Posts: 957 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @gdawg4life yea it’s a newer rule cause teams were doing what Miami did

  • judasdurantjudasdurant Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Can we all drink too Jeff and Soflo, it is national tequil day after all. If you’re not **** up by this point, i questions your uga fandom

  • Denmen185Denmen185 Posts: 7,446 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    As long as I have been following recruiting is that any student that receives a scholarship from the institution counts against the 85. Even if they get an academic scholarship they would be counted against the sport that they play.

  • NomadDawgNomadDawg Posts: 436 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited July 2019

    @gdawg4life , I was curious about this Miami loophole and found an old 1997 article: https://www.sun-sentinel.com/news/fl-xpm-1997-02-06-9702060103-story.html

    As far as I can tell, Miami was looking for ways to get around NCAA sanctions and looked at adding track players and/or deferring players till the spring. It looks like the track idea was shutdown. Interesting reading through it, it looks possible that the 2 year PWO rule may have come about because of this.


    NCAA rules specifically state that if football coaches recruit an athlete who enrolls and participates in track (or any sport) as well as football, his scholarship must count against football. Puckett said he made an official visit to UM on Dec. 13 and planned to be roommates with football signee Randy Gilbert.

    "The rules were not designed so an institution could recruit an athlete for football and track, and then give the athlete a track scholarship," Mallonee said. "The rule specifically states if an individual is recruited for football or offered financial aid in football, he must count in football."

    Mallonee was asked if there's any gray areas that would allow a football coach to recruit an athlete to a track scholarship.

    "There are no gray areas," Mallonee said. "We all know what 'recruited' means. Either a football coach is talking to a prospect or he isn't. You are not supposed to hide [football players) in other sports."

    ETA: Then again, even if the limit on track scholarships being used for football players was an NCAA rule at the time, who's to say the NCAA actually enforced it back then. Perhaps they finally just tightened up on their own rules.

  • scooterdawgscooterdawg Posts: 3,066 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Great answer. That's kinda where I'm leaning as well and I didn't really take the maturity rumors(and they are just rumors) into account as much as the fact that literally every expert thinks he stays in TX and while I wouldn't put anything past Dell, Emery showed that it's tough to get out from the home state.

  • Denmen185Denmen185 Posts: 7,446 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    I think that La is the hardest state to get from as there is only one team in state. Texas has numerous colleges so the loyalty is not as strong.

  • texdawgtexdawg Posts: 11,581 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Absolutely correct. La is probably the toughest but many states are difficult to pull kids from.TX, CA, FL not so much.

  • NCDawg4NCDawg4 Posts: 201 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    Agree, if Tank is first, if he isn’t and Evans comes home, that’s on Tank. Can’t turn away talent like Evans

This discussion has been closed.