Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
COVID-19 Check-in
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
If someone has to be hospitalized due to COVID-19, and they die from a heart attack COVID-19 should be listed as the acute cause of death. Here is a link that gives some details on COVID-19 and heart disease
Pg was referencing people with mild symptoms not being hospitalized and dying from an unrelated event being included in death tolls to inflate numbers for some nefarious purpose. In no way should a baseless conspiracy theory be considered a good point.
This goes into the financials of treating covid patients. I can also give several links of hospitals struggling to stay afloat from lack of revenue. Can't make money without the elective procedures.
I appreciate your measured responses, and I agree with you, in general. Unfortunately politics and money always get in the way. There was a disincentive to list AIDS as the COD in the 80's. They listed it as "pneumonia" instead. Conversely, there's an incentive to list CV-19 as the COD today. Rather than cancer, heart disease, or other.
I had no idea some hospitals were underutilized. I feel bad for those with relatives getting less work/hours, but thank you for sharing.
One thing we haven't really thought about as a nation regarding our economy is how it will be changing a lot over the coming year. We have placed so much emphasis on efficiency that we have many sectors that are less adaptable. Farmers who put milk in single servings for schools have to dump their milk because they don't have the packaging to sell it to grocery stores. It's kind of like hospitals across America where some are overwhelmed with demand and others can't sell their services.
In general, there is going to a lot of change from how food is sold to how we travel and how sports operate. There will be some new winners and losers economically from all of this. Those companies that can adapt and take advantage of where demand is going will survive. Others that can't won't.
There has been much talk about the Covid deaths being overstated by it "being blamed" for death in those with underlying health conditions. The reality is that the vast majority of people have underlying conditions.
In 2000 I had a heart blockage that was cleared and had a stent inserted. The procedure plus medication has resulted in me living a normal and active life for 20 years. I had a heart cath as recently as 2018 which showed that the heart was perfectly healthy. At 70 years old I would likely die if I contracted the disease. In this instance I would most definitely die of cardiac arrest as a direct result of Covid-19. My underlying heart condition would play zero part in my death!
What is really unknown at this point is the long term consequences of those in their 20's, 30's and 40's+ that recover from the severe cases of the virus. I have seen a number of reports saying that CT chest scans can show that the individual has had Covid suggesting to me that it leaves behind scar tissue. What impact will this have on life expectancy in those that had it bad enough to require hospitalization. The true toll may not be known for decades.
Through yesterday
Deep state conspiracy? Good one. I am a long way from that. I’m more on the “mismanagement and incompetent governance” train. Particularly on the local and State levels.
Here you ate coming at me with insults, just as pocoyo came at me with snide remarks for bo reason. At least you aren’t crying about how I was rude to you. What he is doing here is about like spitting on someone and feigning offense when being told to FO in response. It’s pretty ridiculous. Both of you.
Yesterday only. IMO each state needs to test 150 per 100k daily before reopening.
As can be seen all states are below the 150 target for testing, some woefully!
They lost credibility in that article when they went in to how hospitals bill $70k plus but insurers only allow for $30k plus. The insurers are still paying at a rate above actual cost. The notion that “increased xrays and scans” are a financial drain is laughable, and illustrative of what is wrong with the cost curve in medicine. The actual cost of a single xray is close to zilch once the machine has already been acquired, but the hospitals view those as $200 a pop drains on revenue in their accounting games.
If the “paper loss” on average is $3000 per patient, then that is easily explained. The average Obamacare deductible is $4000. Dead people don’t pay, and most people don’t have that much spare change reserved to cover the deductible associated with their socialized medicine experiment, also known as The AFFORDABLE Care Act.
Wouldn’t you expect testing to drop at this point? We’ve been shutdown for nearly a month. In theory, there should be less people showing up with the symptoms to justify testing. Right or wrong? I think we need large scale antibodies testing to help reset the level of paranoia and fear. An more accurate understanding of the mortality is what will get society cranking again.
The local and state governments will also likely discourage increased testing now that doing so is directly tied to how much they are able to reopen their own economies.
Blaming local and state officials is, in the main, baseless. The Federal government has completely abdicated it's responsibility and appears to be more concerned with elevating prices for critical supplies than addressing the health and safety of front-line "troops" and the general public.
Mods are foxnews watching c0wards and only censor if you speak poorly of dear leader
feel free to call the pandemic a Democrat hoax or blame the entire situation on the media though.
@Bankwalker The time to attempt to control the virus is to test BEFORE it gets out of control. Take South Dakota, 777 have contracted the virus at one facility (directly and indirectly) before anyone was tested (or at least made public). If there was regular testing carried out this outbreak may have been prevented from becoming so severe. Given that at one Ohio prison where everyone was tested revealed that 39% of those testing positive had no symptoms and that apparently 48% of infections occur before the "infecter" displays symptoms, random testing is critical to avoiding Cases and Deaths exploding.
Very few Governors are intentionally restricting testing, indeed many are pleading the Federal government to utilize their (and only their) power to make companies focus on producing necessary testing components. It was promised that 29 million tests would be provided by March 31st but the total as of yesterday is 3.7 million! The only answer for this shortfall seems to be I do not want to do this anymore.
My wife is a RN in a Jacksonville area hospital and their employees are being furloughed due to being slow as well as other are hospitals. Some of her friends are going to agencies to get work. She is in the NICU and has had her hours cut as well.
Good points. I was referencing a study out of MIT that tracked responses to the 1918 pandemic. Cities that shut down sooner and stayed shut the longest had stronger recoveries. Tenses were confusing there. I’ll link below.
On B), while deaths are going to be disproportionally concentrated in those over 70, a lot of people in their 40s and 50s will die as well. Plus, and this is the kicker in my eyes, if we’re looking at 1-2 million deaths at a CFR of 1%, that’s between 20-40 million hospitalizations. From labor supply to consumer confidence, the magnitude of those numbers would devastate the economy even if we are “open”.
As things stand now, this isn’t sustainable in the long term. But until we have better data, testing, public health resources, my point is that there’a some doubt that opening the economy will actually help the economy.
Link to the press release on the historical analysis out of MIT: http://news.mit.edu/2020/pandemic-health-response-economic-recovery-0401