Home General
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

Braves Ongoing Season Comments Thread..

13132343637128

Comments

  • WCDawgWCDawg Posts: 17,293 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Edgar Martinez, Frank Thomas, Paul Molitor, Harold Baines, David Ortiz, Jim Thome. All f those players DHed while still great hitters. Imagine how any of them would affect our lineup.

  • swilkerson73swilkerson73 Posts: 1,122 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    Neither do I but I do enjoy the strategy not having the DH adds. The manager could (and often does) pinch hit in those situations late in games.

    Everyone complains about watching pitchers hit and admittedly most are not good at it.

    But remember this

    Some pitcher can handle the bat.

    After a certain point in the game the pitchers dont really bat anymore. They are pinch hit for.

    The NL will get the DH at some point. And the AL will never get rid of it because of the players union.

    At some point the argument that both leagues should play by the same rules will win out.

  • swilkerson73swilkerson73 Posts: 1,122 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    Very true. The pitcher is just the fielder who stands on the mound and delivers the ball. But anyone could do it.

    Also see Earl Weaver rule if you really want a good fun read about the DH

    Man that guy was waaay ahead of his time.

  • Red_N_BlackRed_N_Black Posts: 353 ✭✭✭✭ Senior


    The theory that the NL will get the DH at some point has been predicted for the last 46 years since the DH was created in 1973. I personally don't see it ever happening, There's too many baseball purists who still see the DH rule as an aberration.

  • swilkerson73swilkerson73 Posts: 1,122 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    The theory that the NL will get the DH at some point has been predicted for the last 46 years since the DH was created in 1973. 

    There's too many baseball purists who still see the DH rule as an aberration.

    I hear what you are saying but most of those people are older. Father time gets us all in the end.

    It will change. Might be 5 years. Might be another 46. But it will.

  • WCDawgWCDawg Posts: 17,293 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    The DH rule is an abhorrent aberration, it sucs bucknuts.

  • TNDawg71TNDawg71 Posts: 2,228 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
  • Red_N_BlackRed_N_Black Posts: 353 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    Let me get this straight. The American league plays a more exciting type of baseball because it employs the DH. Therefore the National League will some day follow suit and go to the DH. Sounds reasonable except for one thing. The NL teams average over 4,000 more fans per game than the AL teams. Of the 10 MLB teams with the lowest attendance this season 8 are AL teams. This despite the fact that the AL teams overall are located in larger markets. Not to mention the fact that the AL figures attendance by tickets sold and the NL uses actual turnstile counts.

  • WCDawgWCDawg Posts: 17,293 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    I don't consider AL baseball as being more exciting than the more complex NL variety, not at all.

  • WCDawgWCDawg Posts: 17,293 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited July 2019

    Our guys had quiet nights in The All Star game. FF had a walk, Acuna went 0-2 and while Soroka set them down 1..2..3 in the inning he pitched, the box score is deceiving. He wasn't sharp at all. He went to full counts twice and only threw a couple of strikes, the hitters just missed hittable pitches. This was the 4th straight appearance where he wasn't sharp. He seems to have little idea where the ball is going of late, I'm a bit worried.

  • GeorgiaGirlGeorgiaGirl Posts: 1,854 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Because I’m bored, I decided to go back and look at the zone maps for Soroka’s last start. What I said in other channels (and maybe once on here) and what Ivan the Great said on talking chop became blatantly obvious when I looked in retrospective, the Phillies sat on the sinker at the knees and simply hit it where it’s pitched for the first inning on him, and they have good low ball hitters to boot too (at least with Kingery, and I think Segura too). Looking at the location map, I’d say there was maybe 2 mistakes made in the inning that were taken advantage of, and no, they came after the first three hitters (partially helped by the hit and run but even if it was an out, Segura sitting on a sinker led to him hitting the ball at least 100 MPH). After that became a problem, they switched to the changeup, and it worked for the second turn through because the Phillies were still sitting on the sinker at the knees.

    Was there really a difference between that start and let’s say, the Padres start in location for example (which I also pulled up)? Honestly, no not really based on the location maps I looked at. In the Padres start, he came out with very similar location (which granted, put him in a little bit of trouble in the 1st then too, but still) to how he started vs the Phillies.

    BTW: What I was saying in other channels was the Phillies were sitting sinker and it might be a night to throw the 4-seamer instead. I didn’t even think about the changeup, but that worked.

    So, there’s two things based off that, one, in the modern day, keeping the ball low doesn’t always work (the Pirates also had a bunch of good low ball hitters), and two, they are indeed, adjusting to Soroka.

    There's good reason why I keep saying that Soroka is more likely to be a top 30 starter (a #1) than an ace, like the Verlanders and Scherzers. Perhaps he has a full year or two of a mid to high two's ERA in his career but his most likely year to year outcome is 200+ innings and a 3-3.5 ERA.

  • WCDawgWCDawg Posts: 17,293 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate
    edited July 2019

    GG. The difference in Soroka's results over the past 4 games and his 1st 11 games has nothing to do with adjustments by opponents in my opinion. When he's getting the movement on all of his pitches and he has command of them like he had over his record setting start of giving up 1 or fewer runs in 9 of his first 11 starts, all opponents can do IS guess. Even then there was so much movement and he could throw any pitch on any count they couldn't sit on any particular pitch with any favorable degree of success.

    In short when he pitches like he did over those 11 games he is truly great. He has gotten progressively worse with both command and action on his pitches over his last 3 starts and his inning in The All Star game though and it worries me. I don't think he needs to make any adjustments to what he was doing, he just needs to get back to where he was.

    Honestly if you can't watch the actual games and SEE the difference in where he was and where he's been the last few weeks, I don't know what to say. I mean he's missing the catcher's set up spot by up to 2 feet where he was bullseye on most pitches earlier in the season. If he regains his form and maintains it, he'll be a great pitcher. He doesn't have Scherzer's power though, so in that much we agree. It is harder to maintain excellence when you are more dependent on mastering yourself like Maddux did, so fewer are able to pull it off. Power is power, as long as Scherzer has it and can throw strikes, he'll be exceptional.

  • MODawgMODawg Posts: 479 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    If David Ortiz was in this line up, it could compare to the best line ups in baseball history.

  • WCDawgWCDawg Posts: 17,293 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    No doubt MODawg. I don't know how old you are but Thomas, Molitor, Ortiz and Thome were all great hitters. Baines was a very good hitter, but not great. At his best Thomas was probably the best of the lot. He was the first modern hitter who could hit 40 hr AND hit .340.

  • MODawgMODawg Posts: 479 ✭✭✭✭ Senior

    The Big Hurt was scary for opposing pitchers, no doubt about that. Didn't realize he hit for that high of an avg though. Imagine what he could do with these new balls

This discussion has been closed.