Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
Comments
Lowly Rockies? Right you are. They have won just 12 games so far.
But the worst team ever had to be the 1899 Cleveland Spiders who played prior to the modern era and won just 20 games. That record is safe. Hopefully for Rockies fans.
I wonder how many games they played in a season back then.
I think they played 154, even though it was just a couple of years before the start of modern era.
In 1875-1885, several teams played just 50 games or so.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/teams/CLV/1899.shtml
@MarkBoknecht is correct. 154. Which I think is the standard number of games played until 1961 when the league expanded increasing the number of games to the number we all know. 162.
Oddly enough it was the very year Maris broke Ruth's single season mark hitting 61. Hence the asterisk. Which was unfair to Maris.
Nice win by Braves. Elder wasn't sharp but Braves bats picked them up in the late innings, scoring 11 runs in the 6th-8th innings. Big 3-run homer by Michael "too fat" Harris and some really good situational hitting by the other "fat. out-of-shape" Braves. Good start to the series.
Strider looked like the old Strider. That was good. Sale wins today we get the sweep and maybe can get this team moving again.
Not sure how many of you are familiar with the Pythagorean Theory of Baseball. Was developed by Bill James the father of modern Baseball analytics. Basically is says if you have scored this many runs all year and given up this many your record should be this. It's pretty accurate too.
If you've ever seen the movie Moneyball it's used in the film as well. When the Jonah Hill character is explaining to Billy Beane we need to score this many runs and only surrender this many to make the playoff he is referring to this formula.
The Braves record according to the formula right now should be 37-32. Not 31-38. They are 6 games behind where the numbers say they should be. Those that follow the team will understand this. They have lost 1 run games late in almost comical ways.
Not saying they have played well. They haven't. But they haven't really been as bad as their record says either. And you have to figure that starts to level out a little.
As for won/loss record, another baseball "rule" is that "things even out". I look for some of those one-run losses to even out.
But here are some other #s. It might take 90 wins to make the playoffs. That means we might need at least 59 wins. With 86 games left to play, we'd have to win 68% of our remaining games. That would be difficult. It would mean we would have to play incredibly well, especially within our division. I suspect some team has done that before, but not often. It's a deep hole, but I think the Braves have their shovels out.
Just a thought, but, how do you DIG your way OUT of a deep hole?
Doubtful we'll make make the playoffs if we have to play .680 ball. But it seems like we can get back to respectability. Strider and Acuna are back. And Acuna is on fire.
We've had some gut-wrenching losses. That game where we opened with a 5-0 lead only to lose stands out. Series sweeps by the Giants and Padres earlier this month added to our inexplicable start.
Still, confident we can play better. It's that bullpen that worries me. Strong group of relief pitchers that have failed to deliver. I just don't understand it.
Baseball is a funny game - very possibly the origin of the adage "if you want to make God laugh, tell him your plans". I doubt I'll ever figure it out. Also makes me wonder - does good pitching beat good hitting or does good hitting beat good pitching. That's something we can argue about when the SBIV debate dies down,
Didn't see this one coming. Bravos lose 10-1. Wasted a 15-strikeout performance by Grant Holmes. Oh, well. The hole just got deeper.
can’t lose to the Rockies