Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)
- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans
- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum
- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.
Comments
I understand where you are coming from but I do think your opinion is a bit short sighted. Kids in the recruiting process want to win. They want a chance to play for championships. As a athlete who recently went through the recruiting process himself, I think that is the main concern on most players minds. Yes if Issac nauta was at a Florida, vandy or ole miss he would be the featured pass catcher for their offense but I think if you ask him he'd rather be in the playoffs and playing for a natty championship in his hometown.
These kids want to get to the NFL when they come in at Nauta's level.
If he gets more opportunities, fine, otherwise he will have made a mistake coming to UGA.
He did have a good first year for a freshman, so there is reason to think it was just a one year thing.
Remember though, we thought Chaney needed to target TEs more LAST year, then he dropped to less than half of the passes to TEs this season.
I'm sorry, but if I was Ford's coach or Dad I would have wanted him at Oklahoma or another program that targets their TEs a lot.
Way too many “we don’t use our TE threads.” Kirby has addressed this and it was referenced in this thread. TE are thrown to more frequently when teams play in a zone defense. Since teams stacked the box against us all yr TEs weren’t open. They were also used to block for our backfield. This isn’t Madden or fantasy football. Chaney has historically used TEs in his passing game so I’m sure our TEs will get theirs next season as teams start respecting our passing game more.
I think we all wanted to see the TEs targeted more in the passing game but they played an important part of the offense. With Nick and Sony gone the play calling will be more open next season.
So you don't want to sign any tight ends? I am sure the pros will find Nauta and will appreciate how well he can block and, if he can catch ( know he can) they'll find a way to get him the ball. I think he will be a fine tight end - a pass catcher who can block. He won't be overlooked.
I always have the same response when people bring up the “not using TEs” complaint:
Specifically name the players that got the ball too many times, in which the tight ends should have been targeted instead. I’ll wait.
There are a finite number of snaps, you play to your strengths and within your limitations. I think the offense did a **** good job with a freshman QB thrown unexpectedly into the fire in the first game.
He needs to be targeted more than twice a game.
I agree to disagree with you on this one.
You’re acting like our tight ends are riding pine the whole year. They’re not; they’re on the field all game, sometimes 2 or 3 at a time. For one, Nauta has caught passes. He also dropped a crucial pass in the Rose Bowl and almost cost us the game. I don’t enjoy bringing that up, but you’re the one suggesting UGA is doing him a personal disservice. It’s ridiculous.
He will have more than enough film to go pro after this next season. He’s a physical freak, he blocks well, and can run after the catch. It’s ignorant to suggest the NFL won’t know about him because he doesn’t have 800 yards receiving and 14 TDs.
I get it that he needs to block, but I just see him as doing better on Sundays than he is in our system.
I believe the coaches are handling it correctly, but Nauta is not a traditional tight end.
“We don’t use our tight ends” is just another “our offensive playcalling sucks”.
Every single fan base says it, and it’s usually the negative nancies. We just played in a national title game. Is there really nothing that can make you guys happy or appreciate that just maybe the coaching staff pulled out everything they had and deserve a pat on the back instead of this crap?
you can tell the forum is tired of TEs not getting enough passes. Pretty much shut down in a hurry.
I’m guessing the Bama forum is doing the same threads, but on QBs
Apparently, the truth was told to them when Kirby came in on how TE’s would be used at UGA going forward. Basing that off what I read on the home page.
I'm sorry but Kirby is making excuses on this one.
A good OC can get the ball to his best players.
Chaney came to UGA with the claim he knows how to use TEs, but he's yet to demonstrate it.
Stacking the box can be exploited with quick throws to a TE.