Home General
Hey folks - as a member of the DawgNation community, please remember to abide by simple rules of civil engagement with other members:

- Please no inappropriate usernames (remember that there may be youngsters in the room)

- Personal attacks on other community members are unacceptable, practice the good manners your mama taught you when engaging with fellow Dawg fans

- Use common sense and respect personal differences in the community: sexual and other inappropriate language or imagery, political rants and belittling the opinions of others will get your posts deleted and result in warnings and/ or banning from the forum

- 3/17/19 UPDATE -- We've updated the permissions for our "Football" and "Commit to the G" recruiting message boards. We aim to be the best free board out there and that has not changed. We do now ask that all of you good people register as a member of our forum in order to see the sugar that is falling from our skies, so to speak.

Who should The Hawks take at #3 ?....

135

Comments

  • WCDawgWCDawg Posts: 17,293 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @Thelordjohnson said:
    Kings are not interested in Donic. So is he isnt taken by his former coach at #1 he will slide a bit. I look at the draft and there are so many gaurds and wings that ATL has to take one of the bigs early. Don't leave out Mo Bomba as he fits in the Hawks ideas. Then with the latter two pills find a wing and gaurd and try to get rid of Dennis and either Bazemore or Dedmon and start year one of the rebuild.

    I read Suckramento is interested in Doncic, but that report came out just after the lottery a couple of weeks ago.

    New question, what interest if any does Atlanta have in him ?
    My thinking is it's either Jackson or Bagley, but I wouldn't bet the farm on either.

  • BigcalidawgBigcalidawg Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    I’ve really liked led Bagley all along and we need somebody who can go for 20 a night.

    I believe Jackson will work also. If those 2 are gone and we ship off German Chocolate, I say we trade down and take Sexton and figure it out from there.

  • BigcalidawgBigcalidawg Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @JTMoyni said:
    https://hawksquawk.net/community/forum/19-atlanta-hawks-forums/

    I think you're confused on this forum. The attached link should help.

    Man, I haven’t been to that site in years. I was “Givemthebird”

  • BigcalidawgBigcalidawg Posts: 1,363 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @Bigcalidawg said:
    I’ve really liked led Bagley all along and we need somebody who can go for 20 a night.

    I believe Jackson will work also. If those 2 are gone and we ship off German Chocolate, I say we trade down and take Sexton and figure it out from there.

    Ok, I caught myself. If Bagley and Jackson are gone when we pick at 3 we’re taking Ayton.

    Im posting at Red Lobster, smh

  • WCDawgWCDawg Posts: 17,293 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @Bigcalidawg said:
    I’ve really liked led Bagley all along and we need somebody who can go for 20 a night.

    I believe Jackson will work also. If those 2 are gone and we ship off German Chocolate, I say we trade down and take Sexton and figure it out from there.

    Sexton has tools, but he's not special in my opinion.
    Trae Young on the other hand has flaws, but he is a special shooter and a very good passer.
    If I'm trading picks and players to take a PG in this draft, it's either Young or Doncic.

  • ThelordjohnsonThelordjohnson Posts: 4,077 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @WCDawg supposedly Grizzles woulda be the next team interested in Donic.
    Mo is longer than Jackson while yes Jackson had the better offensive upside but he disappeared in competive games. 8 points in the tournament. Plus Bamba has the personality of a Embiid and would help give a fave even if he never is a superstar he'd be a Deandre Jordan like role-player.

  • donmdonm Posts: 10,241 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    I will be interested to see where Trae Young goes. His play really dropped off the 2nd half of the year. I wouldn't be too quick to drop Schroeder. Perhaps the new coaching staff will be able to get his head aligned more effectively.

  • KaseyKasey Posts: 29,860 mod

    @donm said:
    I will be interested to see where Trae Young goes. His play really dropped off the 2nd half of the year. I wouldn't be too quick to drop Schroeder. Perhaps the new coaching staff will be able to get his head aligned more effectively.

    He’s a guaranteed lock to th knicks at 9

  • WCDawgWCDawg Posts: 17,293 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @Thelordjohnson said:
    @WCDawg supposedly Grizzles woulda be the next team interested in Donic.
    Mo is longer than Jackson while yes Jackson had the better offensive upside but he disappeared in competive games. 8 points in the tournament. Plus Bamba has the personality of a Embiid and would help give a fave even if he never is a superstar he'd be a Deandre Jordan like role-player.

    The fact Jackson tailed off late in the season is a concern, but he's the youngest player in this draft. He was sort of a hs senior last season.
    Bamba is longer, he'll be among the longest to ever play in The NBA, still.
    If you watch just his defense on videos Jackson is already a marvel, he will be a superb half court defender.

  • WCDawgWCDawg Posts: 17,293 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @Kasey said:

    @donm said:
    I will be interested to see where Trae Young goes. His play really dropped off the 2nd half of the year. I wouldn't be too quick to drop Schroeder. Perhaps the new coaching staff will be able to get his head aligned more effectively.

    He’s a guaranteed lock to th knicks at 9

    Maybe if he's still on the board at 9, but that is far from certain.

  • KaseyKasey Posts: 29,860 mod

    @WCDawg said:

    @Kasey said:

    @donm said:
    I will be interested to see where Trae Young goes. His play really dropped off the 2nd half of the year. I wouldn't be too quick to drop Schroeder. Perhaps the new coaching staff will be able to get his head aligned more effectively.

    He’s a guaranteed lock to th knicks at 9

    Maybe if he's still on the board at 9, but that is far from certain.

    Ill bet you a dollar he’s on the board at 9. No one needs a point guard

  • WCDawgWCDawg Posts: 17,293 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @Kasey said:

    @WCDawg said:

    @Kasey said:

    @donm said:
    I will be interested to see where Trae Young goes. His play really dropped off the 2nd half of the year. I wouldn't be too quick to drop Schroeder. Perhaps the new coaching staff will be able to get his head aligned more effectively.

    He’s a guaranteed lock to th knicks at 9

    Maybe if he's still on the board at 9, but that is far from certain.

    Ill bet you a dollar he’s on the board at 9. No one needs a point guard

    It's on.
    The draft and rosters are both fluid . We could see trade ups, trade downs and players traded before or during the draft, Schroder is a candidate for relocation.

  • KaseyKasey Posts: 29,860 mod

    @WCDawg said:

    @Kasey said:

    @WCDawg said:

    @Kasey said:

    @donm said:
    I will be interested to see where Trae Young goes. His play really dropped off the 2nd half of the year. I wouldn't be too quick to drop Schroeder. Perhaps the new coaching staff will be able to get his head aligned more effectively.

    He’s a guaranteed lock to th knicks at 9

    Maybe if he's still on the board at 9, but that is far from certain.

    Ill bet you a dollar he’s on the board at 9. No one needs a point guard

    It's on.
    The draft and rosters are both fluid . We could see trade ups, trade downs and players traded before or during the draft, Schroder is a candidate for relocation.

    I’ll take an American dollar or a Canadian dollar FYI

  • WCDawgWCDawg Posts: 17,293 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    @Kasey said:

    @WCDawg said:

    @Kasey said:

    @WCDawg said:

    @Kasey said:

    @donm said:
    I will be interested to see where Trae Young goes. His play really dropped off the 2nd half of the year. I wouldn't be too quick to drop Schroeder. Perhaps the new coaching staff will be able to get his head aligned more effectively.

    He’s a guaranteed lock to th knicks at 9

    Maybe if he's still on the board at 9, but that is far from certain.

    Ill bet you a dollar he’s on the board at 9. No one needs a point guard

    It's on.
    The draft and rosters are both fluid . We could see trade ups, trade downs and players traded before or during the draft, Schroder is a candidate for relocation.

    I’ll take an American dollar or a Canadian dollar FYI

    Sorry, I only carry Albanian coins.

  • WCDawgWCDawg Posts: 17,293 ✭✭✭✭✭ Graduate

    Also, I think either Mikal or Miles Bridges from Michigan St. would be excellent candidates for The Hawks to move up from 19th and draft in the lower top 10.
    Oddly both are similar to Draymond Green,who also played for MSU.

Sign In or Register to comment.